LCVB.DE vs. PRAC.DE
LCVB.DE (Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist) and PRAC.DE (Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A) are both European Corporate Bonds funds from Amundi - LCVB.DE tracks the iBoxx® MSCI ESG EUR Corporates 0-1 while PRAC.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCVB.DE returned -1.08%/yr vs -0.04%/yr for PRAC.DE. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCVB.DE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PRAC.DE.
Performance
LCVB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCVB.DE achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than PRAC.DE's 0.60% return.
LCVB.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 0.67%
- 3Y*
- 1.93%
- 5Y*
- -1.08%
- 10Y*
- -0.35%
PRAC.DE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 2.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- —
LCVB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCVB.DE Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist | 0.94% | 0.95% | 2.69% | 2.15% | -10.56% | -1.94% | 0.71% |
PRAC.DE Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A | 0.60% | 3.03% | 4.31% | 7.53% | -13.95% | -1.04% | 1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCVB.DE and PRAC.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2020 | 0.39 |
The correlation between LCVB.DE and PRAC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCVB.DE vs. PRAC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LCVB.DE
PRAC.DE
LCVB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) and Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCVB.DE | PRAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.12 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 0.76 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 2.65 | -1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCVB.DE | PRAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 0.63 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | -0.01 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.02 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
LCVB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCVB.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.50%, smaller than the maximum PRAC.DE drawdown of -17.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCVB.DE and PRAC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCVB.DE | PRAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.50% | -17.86% | +3.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.44% | -2.70% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.44% | -2.70% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.73% | -17.86% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.79% | -1.69% | -5.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -6.27% | +3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.78% | -0.10% |
Volatility
LCVB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) is 0.10%, while Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that LCVB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCVB.DE | PRAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 0.99% | -0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.51% | 2.77% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55% | 3.26% | -1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.75% | 4.55% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.54% | 4.73% | -2.19% |
LCVB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCVB.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PRAC.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCVB.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCVB.DE nor PRAC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCVB.DE Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 0.82% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.80% | 2.86% | 0.31% | 0.49% |
PRAC.DE Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCVB.DE and PRAC.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCVB.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCVB.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRAC.DE.
LCVB.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG EUR Corporates 0-1, while PRAC.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for LCVB.DE and 0.50% for PRAC.DE.
Find the right allocation for LCVB.DE and PRAC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer