PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCVB.DE vs. IBCS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCVB.DE vs. IBCS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) and iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCVB.DE achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than IBCS.DE's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, LCVB.DE has underperformed IBCS.DE with an annualized return of 0.02%, while IBCS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 0.79% annualized return.


LCVB.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
0.19%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.05%
1Y
2.03%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
-0.30%
10Y*
0.02%

IBCS.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
0.70%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.59%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
0.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCVB.DE vs. IBCS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCVB.DE
Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist
1.04%2.42%3.91%3.23%-10.56%-1.94%1.32%1.71%-0.06%0.35%
IBCS.DE
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF
1.40%2.83%3.66%7.36%-14.02%-1.42%2.71%6.17%-1.32%1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between LCVB.DE and IBCS.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.42

The correlation between LCVB.DE and IBCS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCVB.DE vs. IBCS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCVB.DE
LCVB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LCVB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCS.DE
IBCS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
IBCS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCVB.DE vs. IBCS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) and iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCVB.DEIBCS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.83

1.13

+0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.82

0.86

+7.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

48.93

2.92

+46.01

LCVB.DE vs. IBCS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCVB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is higher than the IBCS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCVB.DE and IBCS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCVB.DE vs. IBCS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCVB.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.50%, smaller than the maximum IBCS.DE drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCVB.DE and IBCS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCVB.DEIBCS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.50%

-17.87%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.23%

-2.78%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.67%

-2.78%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.73%

-17.87%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.50%

-17.87%

+3.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

-2.06%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-2.98%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.82%

-0.78%

Volatility

LCVB.DE vs. IBCS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) is 0.14%, while iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCS.DE) has a volatility of 0.83%. This indicates that LCVB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCVB.DEIBCS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

0.83%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.39%

2.94%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63%

3.38%

-2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.60%

4.74%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.46%

4.47%

-2.01%

LCVB.DE vs. IBCS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCVB.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCVB.DE vs. IBCS.DE - Dividend Comparison

LCVB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than IBCS.DE's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCS.DE
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF
3.11%3.03%2.74%2.31%1.05%0.73%0.85%0.99%1.10%1.09%1.27%1.57%
LCVB.DE
Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist
1.44%1.46%1.18%1.05%0.51%0.82%1.26%1.51%1.80%2.86%0.27%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCVB.DE and IBCS.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCVB.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCVB.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IBCS.DE.

LCVB.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG EUR Corporates 0-1, while IBCS.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Liquid Corporates Large Cap. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for LCVB.DE and 0.20% for IBCS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCVB.DE and IBCS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer