PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCVB.DE vs. COVR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCVB.DE vs. COVR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) and PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist (COVR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCVB.DE achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than COVR.DE's -0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LCVB.DE has underperformed COVR.DE with an annualized return of -0.35%, while COVR.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 0.53% annualized return.


LCVB.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.94%
6M
-0.40%
1Y
0.67%
3Y*
1.93%
5Y*
-1.08%
10Y*
-0.35%

COVR.DE

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
-0.38%
1Y
0.96%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
0.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCVB.DE vs. COVR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCVB.DE
Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist
0.94%0.95%2.69%2.15%-10.56%-1.94%1.32%1.70%-0.05%0.35%
COVR.DE
PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.22%2.66%3.80%6.11%-12.85%-2.27%3.03%3.98%0.05%2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between LCVB.DE and COVR.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2014

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between LCVB.DE and COVR.DE has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCVB.DE vs. COVR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCVB.DE
LCVB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LCVB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

COVR.DE
COVR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
COVR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COVR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
COVR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
COVR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
COVR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCVB.DE vs. COVR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) and PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist (COVR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCVB.DECOVR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.05

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

0.23

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.00

0.65

+0.35

LCVB.DE vs. COVR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCVB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the COVR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCVB.DE and COVR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCVB.DECOVR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

0.26

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

-0.13

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

0.18

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.21

+0.36

Drawdowns

LCVB.DE vs. COVR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCVB.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.50%, smaller than the maximum COVR.DE drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCVB.DE and COVR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCVB.DECOVR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.50%

-16.36%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-2.85%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.44%

-2.85%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.73%

-15.69%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.50%

-16.36%

+1.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-4.21%

-2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-4.10%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.00%

-0.32%

Volatility

LCVB.DE vs. COVR.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) is 0.10%, while PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist (COVR.DE) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that LCVB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COVR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCVB.DECOVR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.10%

0.92%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

2.11%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55%

2.48%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

3.77%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.54%

2.98%

-0.44%

LCVB.DE vs. COVR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCVB.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than COVR.DE's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCVB.DE vs. COVR.DE - Dividend Comparison

LCVB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COVR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COVR.DE
PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist
2.49%2.43%1.66%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.42%1.20%0.78%0.57%0.74%0.86%
LCVB.DE
Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.51%0.82%1.26%1.51%1.80%2.86%0.31%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCVB.DE and COVR.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCVB.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCVB.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for COVR.DE.

LCVB.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG EUR Corporates 0-1, while COVR.DE tracks PIMCO Covered Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for LCVB.DE and 0.43% for COVR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCVB.DE and COVR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer