PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCRP.L vs. XYLD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCRP.L vs. XYLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LCRP.L is traded in GBP, while XYLD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XYLD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


LCRP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
1.41%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
1.61%

XYLD.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.16%
YTD
1.12%
6M
0.44%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
2.55%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCRP.L vs. XYLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LCRP.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%-1.12%0.56%4.59%-16.57%-0.11%10.05%16.19%3.53%
XYLD.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D
1.12%-1.37%6.73%0.47%2.15%1.31%7.05%12.73%7.59%

Correlation

The correlation between LCRP.L and XYLD.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2018

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between LCRP.L and XYLD.L has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCRP.L vs. XYLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCRP.L
LCRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LCRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD.L
XYLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XYLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCRP.L vs. XYLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCRP.LXYLD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.14

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.02

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

2.88

-0.83

LCRP.L vs. XYLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the XYLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCRP.L and XYLD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCRP.LXYLD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

0.81

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.36

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.49

-0.28

Drawdowns

LCRP.L vs. XYLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCRP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.37%, which is greater than XYLD.L's maximum drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCRP.L and XYLD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCRP.LXYLD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.37%

-15.48%

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-5.03%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.82%

-8.74%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.17%

-15.48%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.73%

-4.15%

-14.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-5.22%

-7.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

1.79%

+1.58%

Volatility

LCRP.L vs. XYLD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) is 0.00%, while Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L) has a volatility of 1.51%. This indicates that LCRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCRP.LXYLD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

1.51%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

4.86%

-2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

6.35%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.04%

8.28%

+3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.86%

9.30%

+3.56%

LCRP.L vs. XYLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCRP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD.L's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCRP.L vs. XYLD.L - Dividend Comparison

LCRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than XYLD.L's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
LCRP.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.75%5.64%5.14%4.64%4.37%3.29%3.49%0.00%
XYLD.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D
3.76%3.61%3.34%2.88%6.03%3.88%3.78%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCRP.L and XYLD.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCRP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCRP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XYLD.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCRP.L and 0.16% for XYLD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCRP.L and XYLD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer