PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCRP.L vs. VUCP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCRP.L vs. VUCP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, LCRP.L has underperformed VUCP.L with an annualized return of 1.61%, while VUCP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 2.70% annualized return.


LCRP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
1.41%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
1.61%

VUCP.L

1D
0.29%
1M
1.42%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-0.47%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
1.87%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCRP.L vs. VUCP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCRP.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%-1.12%0.56%4.59%-16.57%-0.11%10.05%16.19%-5.81%-2.15%
VUCP.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
0.04%-0.91%4.32%1.29%-5.38%-0.63%4.96%10.22%2.22%-3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LCRP.L and VUCP.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2016

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between LCRP.L and VUCP.L has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCRP.L vs. VUCP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCRP.L
LCRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LCRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VUCP.L
VUCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VUCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCRP.L vs. VUCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCRP.LVUCP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.15

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.08

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

2.44

-0.39

LCRP.L vs. VUCP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the VUCP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCRP.L and VUCP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCRP.LVUCP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

0.90

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.12

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.27

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.27

-0.06

Drawdowns

LCRP.L vs. VUCP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCRP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.37%, which is greater than VUCP.L's maximum drawdown of -16.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCRP.L and VUCP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCRP.LVUCP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.37%

-16.84%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-5.00%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.82%

-9.00%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.17%

-13.14%

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.37%

-16.84%

-11.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.73%

-7.67%

-11.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-7.67%

-5.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.21%

+1.16%

Volatility

LCRP.L vs. VUCP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) is 0.00%, while Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L) has a volatility of 1.62%. This indicates that LCRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUCP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCRP.LVUCP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

1.62%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

4.46%

-2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

5.99%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.04%

8.51%

+3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.86%

9.92%

+2.94%

LCRP.L vs. VUCP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCRP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VUCP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCRP.L vs. VUCP.L - Dividend Comparison

LCRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than VUCP.L's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LCRP.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.75%5.64%5.14%4.64%4.37%3.29%3.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUCP.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
3.85%4.02%4.73%3.57%2.79%1.85%2.36%2.64%2.58%2.57%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCRP.L and VUCP.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUCP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUCP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LCRP.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCRP.L and 0.09% for VUCP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCRP.L and VUCP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer