LCRP.L vs. SUSD.L
LCRP.L (SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and SUSD.L (SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from State Street - LCRP.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD while SUSD.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LCRP.L returned 1.61%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for SUSD.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
LCRP.L vs. SUSD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, LCRP.L has underperformed SUSD.L with an annualized return of 1.61%, while SUSD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 3.36% annualized return.
LCRP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.82%
- 1Y
- 6.35%
- 3Y*
- 1.41%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
SUSD.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.41%
- 3Y*
- 2.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
LCRP.L vs. SUSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCRP.L SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | -1.12% | 0.56% | 4.59% | -16.57% | -0.11% | 10.05% | 16.19% | -5.81% | -2.15% |
SUSD.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 1.34% | -1.69% | 7.18% | -0.46% | 9.68% | 1.10% | -0.39% | 1.34% | 7.32% | -7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCRP.L and SUSD.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2015 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LCRP.L and SUSD.L has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCRP.L vs. SUSD.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCRP.L
SUSD.L
LCRP.L vs. SUSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCRP.L | SUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.26 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 3.31 | -1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCRP.L | SUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.87 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.49 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.37 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.40 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
LCRP.L vs. SUSD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCRP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.37%, which is greater than SUSD.L's maximum drawdown of -15.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCRP.L and SUSD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCRP.L | SUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.37% | -15.18% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.77% | -4.27% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.82% | -9.03% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.17% | -15.18% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.37% | -15.18% | -13.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.73% | -3.84% | -14.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.80% | -5.84% | -6.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 1.63% | +1.74% |
Volatility
LCRP.L vs. SUSD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) is 0.00%, while SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUSD.L) has a volatility of 1.75%. This indicates that LCRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCRP.L | SUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 1.75% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.04% | 4.50% | -2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.08% | 6.19% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.04% | 8.17% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 9.23% | +3.63% |
LCRP.L vs. SUSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LCRP.L and SUSD.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LCRP.L vs. SUSD.L - Dividend Comparison
LCRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than SUSD.L's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCRP.L SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 2.75% | 5.64% | 5.14% | 4.64% | 4.37% | 3.29% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUSD.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.60% | 4.91% | 4.20% | 3.11% | 1.14% | 1.80% | 2.77% | 2.57% | 1.66% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCRP.L and SUSD.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCRP.L and SUSD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
LCRP.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while SUSD.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD.
Find the right allocation for LCRP.L and SUSD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer