LCRP.L vs. IWDP.L
LCRP.L (SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and IWDP.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - LCRP.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while IWDP.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LCRP.L returned 1.61%/yr vs 3.99%/yr for IWDP.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCRP.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IWDP.L.
Performance
LCRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LCRP.L is traded in GBP, while IWDP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWDP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, LCRP.L has underperformed IWDP.L with an annualized return of 1.61%, while IWDP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 3.99% annualized return.
LCRP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.82%
- 1Y
- 6.35%
- 3Y*
- 1.41%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
IWDP.L
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 11.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 3.99%
LCRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCRP.L SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | -1.12% | 0.56% | 4.59% | -16.57% | -0.11% | 10.05% | 16.19% | -5.81% | -2.15% |
IWDP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP | 6.86% | 1.71% | 1.22% | 4.00% | -14.93% | 26.93% | -12.50% | 17.31% | -0.09% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCRP.L and IWDP.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2015 | 0.34 |
The correlation between LCRP.L and IWDP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCRP.L vs. IWDP.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCRP.L
IWDP.L
LCRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCRP.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.18 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.33 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 4.13 | -2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCRP.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.05 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.13 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.26 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.26 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
LCRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCRP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.37%, smaller than the maximum IWDP.L drawdown of -58.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCRP.L and IWDP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCRP.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.37% | -58.29% | +29.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.77% | -8.61% | +3.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.82% | -16.50% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.17% | -26.31% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.37% | -35.66% | +7.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.73% | -3.40% | -15.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.80% | -11.23% | -1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.78% | +0.59% |
Volatility
LCRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) is 0.00%, while iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that LCRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWDP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCRP.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 3.00% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.04% | 8.45% | -6.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.08% | 10.89% | -4.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.04% | 13.76% | -1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 15.54% | -2.68% |
LCRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCRP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDP.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCRP.L vs. IWDP.L - Dividend Comparison
LCRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than IWDP.L's 3.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP | 3.03% | 3.13% | 3.17% | 3.14% | 3.56% | 2.17% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.82% | 3.05% | 2.96% | 2.93% |
LCRP.L SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 2.75% | 5.64% | 5.14% | 4.64% | 4.37% | 3.29% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCRP.L and IWDP.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCRP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCRP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IWDP.L.
LCRP.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IWDP.L is REIT. LCRP.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while IWDP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCRP.L and 0.59% for IWDP.L.
Find the right allocation for LCRP.L and IWDP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer