PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCRP.L vs. FLO5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCRP.L vs. FLO5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LCRP.L is traded in GBP, while FLO5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FLO5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


LCRP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
1.41%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
1.61%

FLO5.L

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.55%
1Y
1.25%
3Y*
-2.38%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCRP.L vs. FLO5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCRP.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%-1.12%0.56%4.59%-16.57%-0.11%10.05%16.19%-5.81%4.41%
FLO5.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF
-0.05%-6.83%1.88%-4.56%11.92%1.15%-4.18%-2.07%4.95%0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between LCRP.L and FLO5.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017

0.46

The correlation between LCRP.L and FLO5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCRP.L vs. FLO5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCRP.L
LCRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LCRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FLO5.L
FLO5.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FLO5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCRP.L vs. FLO5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCRP.LFLO5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.04

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

0.19

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

0.38

+1.67

LCRP.L vs. FLO5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the FLO5.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCRP.L and FLO5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCRP.LFLO5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

0.17

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.13

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.02

+0.19

Drawdowns

LCRP.L vs. FLO5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCRP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.37%, which is greater than FLO5.L's maximum drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCRP.L and FLO5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCRP.LFLO5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.37%

-20.77%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-6.65%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.82%

-13.32%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.17%

-20.77%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.73%

-19.14%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-9.77%

-3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

3.30%

+0.07%

Volatility

LCRP.L vs. FLO5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) is 0.00%, while iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that LCRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLO5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCRP.LFLO5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

2.80%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

5.01%

-2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

7.27%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.04%

9.03%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.86%

9.16%

+3.70%

LCRP.L vs. FLO5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCRP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FLO5.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCRP.L vs. FLO5.L - Dividend Comparison

LCRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than FLO5.L's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLO5.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF
0.05%0.05%0.06%0.06%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.03%0.02%0.00%
LCRP.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.75%5.64%5.14%4.64%4.37%3.29%3.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCRP.L and FLO5.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLO5.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLO5.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LCRP.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCRP.L and 0.10% for FLO5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCRP.L and FLO5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer