LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L
LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) and MIBX.L (Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while MIBX.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LCPE.L returned 10.08%/yr vs 17.22%/yr for MIBX.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCPE.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MIBX.L.
Performance
LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCPE.L achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than MIBX.L's 16.96% return. Over the past 10 years, LCPE.L has underperformed MIBX.L with an annualized return of 10.08%, while MIBX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.22% annualized return.
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 28.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
MIBX.L
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 16.96%
- 6M
- 17.52%
- 1Y
- 37.96%
- 3Y*
- 29.83%
- 5Y*
- 20.53%
- 10Y*
- 17.22%
LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 13.22% | 18.27% | -2.33% | 10.46% | -0.17% | 17.51% | 8.55% | 16.87% | -6.17% | 9.67% |
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 16.96% | 43.78% | 13.17% | 30.61% | -3.53% | 18.16% | 1.49% | 25.15% | -12.72% | 21.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCPE.L and MIBX.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2015 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LCPE.L and MIBX.L has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCPE.L
MIBX.L
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
LCPE.L
MIBX.L
Healthcare
LCPE.L
MIBX.L
Basic Materials
LCPE.L
MIBX.L
Consumer Cyclical
LCPE.L
MIBX.L
Industrials
LCPE.L
MIBX.L
Technology
LCPE.L
MIBX.L
Communication Services
LCPE.L
MIBX.L
Energy
LCPE.L
MIBX.L
Real Estate
LCPE.L
MIBX.L
Financial Services
LCPE.L
-
MIBX.L
Utilities
LCPE.L
-
MIBX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCPE.L
MIBX.L
LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCPE.L | MIBX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.44 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 3.68 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 13.42 | +0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCPE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.75%, smaller than the maximum MIBX.L drawdown of -67.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCPE.L and MIBX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCPE.L | MIBX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.75% | -67.93% | +40.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -10.26% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -15.64% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.39% | -24.06% | +11.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.75% | -35.10% | +7.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -2.75% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -39.85% | +35.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.82% | -0.78% |
Volatility
LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) is 3.00%, while Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that LCPE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIBX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCPE.L | MIBX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 3.93% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.58% | 12.41% | -3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.30% | 15.13% | -3.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 17.95% | -5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 18.93% | -4.68% |
LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCPE.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MIBX.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Dividend Comparison
LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MIBX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 3.15% | 3.68% | 3.93% | 3.73% | 3.88% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 4.02% | 4.05% | 2.75% | 3.56% | 3.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCPE.L and MIBX.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MIBX.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIBX.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while MIBX.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LCPE.L and 0.35% for MIBX.L.
Find the right allocation for LCPE.L and MIBX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer