PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCPE.L achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than MIBX.L's 16.96% return. Over the past 10 years, LCPE.L has underperformed MIBX.L with an annualized return of 10.08%, while MIBX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.22% annualized return.


LCPE.L

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.67%
YTD
13.22%
6M
14.27%
1Y
28.66%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
10.08%

MIBX.L

1D
-1.04%
1M
4.43%
YTD
16.96%
6M
17.52%
1Y
37.96%
3Y*
29.83%
5Y*
20.53%
10Y*
17.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
13.22%18.27%-2.33%10.46%-0.17%17.51%8.55%16.87%-6.17%9.67%
MIBX.L
Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist
16.96%43.78%13.17%30.61%-3.53%18.16%1.49%25.15%-12.72%21.14%

Correlation

The correlation between LCPE.L and MIBX.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2015

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between LCPE.L and MIBX.L has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LCPE.L
MIBX.L

Consumer Defensive

32.8%
0.4%

Healthcare

32.6%
1.2%

Basic Materials

32.3%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
9.9%

Industrials

0.2%
11.4%

Technology

0.2%
5.5%

Communication Services

0.0%
1.7%

Energy

0.0%
7.9%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.3%

Financial Services

-

45.3%

Utilities

-

15.9%

Consumer Defensive

LCPE.L
32.8%
MIBX.L
0.4%

Healthcare

LCPE.L
32.6%
MIBX.L
1.2%

Basic Materials

LCPE.L
32.3%
MIBX.L
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

LCPE.L
1.9%
MIBX.L
9.9%

Industrials

LCPE.L
0.2%
MIBX.L
11.4%

Technology

LCPE.L
0.2%
MIBX.L
5.5%

Communication Services

LCPE.L
0.0%
MIBX.L
1.7%

Energy

LCPE.L
0.0%
MIBX.L
7.9%

Real Estate

LCPE.L
0.0%
MIBX.L
0.3%

Financial Services

LCPE.L

-

MIBX.L
45.3%

Utilities

LCPE.L

-

MIBX.L
15.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MIBX.L
MIBX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MIBX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIBX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIBX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MIBX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIBX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCPE.LMIBX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

3.68

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.01

13.42

+0.59

LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the MIBX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCPE.L and MIBX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCPE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.75%, smaller than the maximum MIBX.L drawdown of -67.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCPE.L and MIBX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCPE.LMIBX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.75%

-67.93%

+40.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-10.26%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

-15.64%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.39%

-24.06%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.75%

-35.10%

+7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-2.75%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-39.85%

+35.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.82%

-0.78%

Volatility

LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) is 3.00%, while Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that LCPE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIBX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCPE.LMIBX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

3.93%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.58%

12.41%

-3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.30%

15.13%

-3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.89%

17.95%

-5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

18.93%

-4.68%

LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCPE.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MIBX.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCPE.L vs. MIBX.L - Dividend Comparison

LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MIBX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MIBX.L
Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist
3.15%3.68%3.93%3.73%3.88%2.09%1.55%4.02%4.05%2.75%3.56%3.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCPE.L and MIBX.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MIBX.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIBX.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while MIBX.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LCPE.L and 0.35% for MIBX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCPE.L and MIBX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer