LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L
LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) and FTEU.L (First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares) are both Europe Equities funds - LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while FTEU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCPE.L returned 9.55%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for FTEU.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCPE.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FTEU.L.
Performance
LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LCPE.L is traded in GBp, while FTEU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FTEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCPE.L achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than FTEU.L's 12.46% return.
LCPE.L
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 14.34%
- 1Y
- 28.26%
- 3Y*
- 12.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
FTEU.L
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 12.46%
- 6M
- 16.02%
- 1Y
- 33.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 13.75% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 12.94% | -2.26% | 9.54% |
FTEU.L First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares | 12.46% | 46.50% | 4.57% | 10.67% | -9.18% | 12.84% | 1.98% | 15.97% | -14.85% | 24.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCPE.L and FTEU.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2016 | 0.31 |
The correlation between LCPE.L and FTEU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCPE.L
FTEU.L
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
LCPE.L
FTEU.L
Healthcare
LCPE.L
FTEU.L
Basic Materials
LCPE.L
FTEU.L
Consumer Cyclical
LCPE.L
FTEU.L
Industrials
LCPE.L
FTEU.L
Technology
LCPE.L
FTEU.L
Communication Services
LCPE.L
FTEU.L
Energy
LCPE.L
FTEU.L
Real Estate
LCPE.L
FTEU.L
Financial Services
LCPE.L
-
FTEU.L
Utilities
LCPE.L
-
FTEU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCPE.L
FTEU.L
LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCPE.L | FTEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.40 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | 3.22 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.02 | 11.91 | +2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCPE.L | FTEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.16 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.66 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.58 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCPE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.05%, smaller than the maximum FTEU.L drawdown of -35.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCPE.L and FTEU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCPE.L | FTEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.05% | -35.87% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -10.50% | +3.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -13.83% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.39% | -24.32% | +11.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -0.50% | -2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -6.51% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.84% | -0.83% |
Volatility
LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) is 3.81%, while First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that LCPE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCPE.L | FTEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 5.08% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 13.10% | -4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.31% | 15.69% | -4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 17.71% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 18.31% | +2.30% |
LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCPE.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FTEU.L's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCPE.L nor FTEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCPE.L and FTEU.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCPE.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCPE.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FTEU.L.
LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FTEU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LCPE.L and 0.80% for FTEU.L.
Find the right allocation for LCPE.L and FTEU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer