PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LCPE.L is traded in GBp, while FTEU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FTEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCPE.L achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than FTEU.L's 12.46% return.


LCPE.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.51%
YTD
13.75%
6M
14.34%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
10.12%

FTEU.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
2.67%
YTD
12.46%
6M
16.02%
1Y
33.96%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
13.75%18.88%-2.83%10.70%0.29%16.28%8.38%12.94%-2.26%9.54%
FTEU.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
12.46%46.50%4.57%10.67%-9.18%12.84%1.98%15.97%-14.85%24.15%

Correlation

The correlation between LCPE.L and FTEU.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2016

0.31

The correlation between LCPE.L and FTEU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LCPE.L
FTEU.L

Consumer Defensive

32.8%
5.3%

Healthcare

32.6%
5.2%

Basic Materials

32.3%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
9.2%

Industrials

0.2%
27.4%

Technology

0.2%
6.0%

Communication Services

0.0%
3.7%

Energy

0.0%
10.8%

Real Estate

0.0%
6.0%

Financial Services

-

10.6%

Utilities

-

8.3%

Consumer Defensive

LCPE.L
32.8%
FTEU.L
5.3%

Healthcare

LCPE.L
32.6%
FTEU.L
5.2%

Basic Materials

LCPE.L
32.3%
FTEU.L
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

LCPE.L
1.9%
FTEU.L
9.2%

Industrials

LCPE.L
0.2%
FTEU.L
27.4%

Technology

LCPE.L
0.2%
FTEU.L
6.0%

Communication Services

LCPE.L
0.0%
FTEU.L
3.7%

Energy

LCPE.L
0.0%
FTEU.L
10.8%

Real Estate

LCPE.L
0.0%
FTEU.L
6.0%

Financial Services

LCPE.L

-

FTEU.L
10.6%

Utilities

LCPE.L

-

FTEU.L
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEU.L
FTEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCPE.LFTEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.40

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

3.22

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

11.91

+2.12

LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCPE.L and FTEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCPE.LFTEU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.16

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.66

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.58

+0.40

Drawdowns

LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCPE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.05%, smaller than the maximum FTEU.L drawdown of -35.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCPE.L and FTEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCPE.LFTEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.05%

-35.87%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-10.50%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

-13.83%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.39%

-24.32%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-0.50%

-2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-6.51%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.84%

-0.83%

Volatility

LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) is 3.81%, while First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that LCPE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCPE.LFTEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

5.08%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

13.10%

-4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

15.69%

-4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

17.71%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.61%

18.31%

+2.30%

LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCPE.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FTEU.L's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCPE.L vs. FTEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCPE.L nor FTEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LCPE.L and FTEU.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCPE.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCPE.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FTEU.L.

LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FTEU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LCPE.L and 0.80% for FTEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCPE.L and FTEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer