LCOW vs. DIVG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LCOW (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF) and DIVG (Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - LCOW tracks the S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index while DIVG tracks the S&P 500 High Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LCOW returned 18.67% vs 22.10% for DIVG. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCOW charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DIVG.

Performance

LCOW vs. DIVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCOW achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly lower than DIVG's 13.33% return.

LCOW

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: 3.86%
• 6M: 2.96%
• 1Y: 18.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIVG

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 22.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCOW vs. DIVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LCOW Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF	3.86%	20.51%
DIVG Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF	13.33%	11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LCOW and DIVG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

LCOW vs. DIVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCOW

LCOW Risk / Return Rank: 45
LCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
LCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 44
LCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
LCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 47

DIVG

DIVG Risk / Return Rank: 72
DIVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
DIVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
DIVG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DIVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
DIVG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCOW vs. DIVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCOW	DIVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.04	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	3.00	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.35	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	4.33	-2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	13.76	-6.27

LCOW vs. DIVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the DIVG Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCOW and DIVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCOW vs. DIVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCOW drawdown since its inception was -10.34%, smaller than the maximum DIVG drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCOW and DIVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCOW	DIVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.34%	-14.95%	+4.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.34%	-5.13%	-5.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.08%	-0.88%	-2.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.41%	-2.25%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	1.61%	+0.89%

Volatility

LCOW vs. DIVG - Volatility Comparison

Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) at 3.49%. This indicates that LCOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCOW	DIVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.04%	3.49%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.71%	7.58%	+2.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.33%	10.87%	+1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.52%	13.18%	-0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.52%	13.18%	-0.66%

LCOW vs. DIVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCOW has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVG's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCOW vs. DIVG - Dividend Comparison

LCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than DIVG's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DIVG Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF	3.06%	3.15%	4.08%
LCOW Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF	0.65%	0.43%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCOW and DIVG in my portfolio?

LCOW and DIVG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCOW or DIVG?

LCOW has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to DIVG (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCOW dropped -10.34% vs DIVG's -14.95%.

Which ETF is better, LCOW or DIVG?

On 1-year performance, DIVG leads with 22.10% vs 18.67% for LCOW. On fees, DIVG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DIVG has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCOW or DIVG?

Over the 1-year period, DIVG has performed better with a 22.10% return vs 18.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCOW or DIVG?

DIVG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for LCOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCOW or DIVG?

DIVG has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.65% for LCOW.

What is the main difference between LCOW and DIVG?

LCOW tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index, while DIVG tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for LCOW and 0.39% for DIVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.