LCILX vs. YFSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX).
LCILX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Mar 31, 2015. YFSIX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 30, 2017.
Performance
LCILX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCILX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund | -5.98% | 10.49% | 14.36% | 16.68% | -20.85% | 24.76% | 35.82% | 37.85% | -2.40% | 19.56% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 8.16% | 14.91% | -0.34% | 16.64% | -9.15% | 13.13% | 18.46% | 24.40% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCILX achieves a -5.98% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 8.16% return.
LCILX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -7.96%
- YTD
- -5.98%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
YFSIX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -10.67%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCILX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCILX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCILX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
LCILX
YFSIX
LCILX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCILX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 0.99 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 1.16 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.26 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 1.36 | -0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 4.42 | -0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCILX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 0.99 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.45 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.71 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCILX and YFSIX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LCILX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison
LCILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund | 5.18% | 4.87% | 6.02% | 0.75% | 0.42% | 1.42% | 4.18% | 0.61% | 0.56% | 0.73% | 0.80% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.68% | 8.02% | 4.32% | 8.18% | 4.76% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LCILX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCILX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum YFSIX drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCILX and YFSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCILX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -35.10% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -14.20% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.19% | -25.14% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.74% | -11.03% | +2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -4.93% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 4.38% | -1.94% |
Volatility
LCILX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) is 4.24%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that LCILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCILX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 9.23% | -4.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 19.89% | -11.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 21.29% | -3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 15.11% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 16.20% | +1.91% |