PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCILX vs. VSTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCILX vs. VSTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VSTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LCILX having a 10.54% return and VSTSX slightly higher at 10.73%.


LCILX

1D
0.97%
1M
1.27%
YTD
10.54%
6M
10.18%
1Y
21.95%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
14.50%

VSTSX

1D
1.14%
1M
0.90%
YTD
10.73%
6M
9.95%
1Y
27.60%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCILX vs. VSTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCILX
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund
10.54%10.49%14.36%16.68%-20.85%24.76%35.82%37.85%-2.40%21.54%
VSTSX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Select Shares
10.73%17.16%23.27%26.54%-19.49%25.75%21.02%30.81%-5.15%20.21%

Correlation

The correlation between LCILX and VSTSX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.96

The correlation between LCILX and VSTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCILX vs. VSTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCILX
LCILX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
LCILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCILX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LCILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCILX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VSTSX
VSTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VSTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VSTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCILX vs. VSTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VSTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCILXVSTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.08

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.78

13.80

-3.02

LCILX vs. VSTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the VSTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCILX and VSTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCILX vs. VSTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCILX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum VSTSX drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCILX and VSTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCILXVSTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-34.97%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-8.92%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.63%

-19.36%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.19%

-25.35%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-1.13%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-4.88%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.99%

+0.02%

Volatility

LCILX vs. VSTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) is 4.13%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VSTSX) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that LCILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCILXVSTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

4.88%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

10.11%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

12.80%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

17.46%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

18.76%

-0.59%

LCILX vs. VSTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCILX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VSTSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCILX vs. VSTSX - Dividend Comparison

LCILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than VSTSX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LCILX
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund
4.40%4.87%6.02%0.75%0.42%1.42%4.18%0.61%0.56%0.73%0.80%
VSTSX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Select Shares
1.04%1.13%1.27%1.43%1.67%1.23%1.44%1.79%2.07%1.74%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, LCILX and VSTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSTSX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to LCILX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCILX dropped -31.70% vs VSTSX's -34.97%.

VSTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCILX and VSTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer