LCILX vs. FSKAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LCILX (ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund) and FSKAX (Fidelity Total Market Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LCILX returned 14.50%/yr vs 15.04%/yr for FSKAX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LCILX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FSKAX.

Performance

LCILX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LCILX having a 10.54% return and FSKAX slightly higher at 10.81%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LCILX having a 14.50% annualized return and FSKAX not far ahead at 15.04%.

LCILX

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: 10.54%
• 6M: 10.18%
• 1Y: 21.95%
• 3Y*: 14.20%
• 5Y*: 8.44%
• 10Y*: 14.50%

FSKAX

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 10.02%
• 1Y: 27.57%
• 3Y*: 20.73%
• 5Y*: 12.91%
• 10Y*: 15.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCILX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund	10.54%	10.49%	14.36%	16.68%	-20.85%	24.76%	35.82%	37.85%	-2.40%	21.54%
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	10.81%	17.06%	23.89%	26.12%	-19.53%	25.66%	20.79%	30.92%	-5.32%	20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between LCILX and FSKAX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.95

The correlation between LCILX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LCILX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCILX

LCILX Risk / Return Rank: 45
LCILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
LCILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LCILX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
LCILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
LCILX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FSKAX

FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCILX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCILX	FSKAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.13	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	2.88	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.38	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	3.08	-0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.78	13.71	-2.93

LCILX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCILX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCILX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCILX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCILX and FSKAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCILX	FSKAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.70%	-35.01%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.74%	-8.92%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.63%	-19.43%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.19%	-25.39%	-1.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.70%	-35.01%	+3.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-1.14%	+0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.26%	-4.01%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	2.00%	+0.01%

Volatility

LCILX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) is 4.13%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that LCILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCILX	FSKAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	4.91%	-0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.72%	10.16%	-0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.31%	12.88%	-0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.37%	17.51%	-0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	18.50%	-0.33%

LCILX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCILX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCILX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

LCILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than FSKAX's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	0.94%	1.01%	1.19%	1.41%	1.62%	1.15%	1.45%	1.94%	2.54%	2.07%	2.43%	0.82%
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund	4.40%	4.87%	6.02%	0.75%	0.42%	1.42%	4.18%	0.61%	0.56%	0.73%	0.80%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCILX and FSKAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, LCILX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LCILX or FSKAX?

FSKAX has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to LCILX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCILX dropped -31.70% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.