LCILX vs. FLVCX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LCILX (ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund) and FLVCX (Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LCILX returned 14.61%/yr vs 16.00%/yr for FLVCX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCILX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FLVCX.

Performance

LCILX vs. FLVCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCILX achieves a 8.68% return, which is significantly lower than FLVCX's 21.32% return. Over the past 10 years, LCILX has underperformed FLVCX with an annualized return of 14.61%, while FLVCX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.00% annualized return.

LCILX

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 8.68%
• 6M: 7.50%
• 1Y: 17.37%
• 3Y*: 14.26%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: 14.61%

FLVCX

• 1D: -4.46%
• 1M: 4.39%
• YTD: 21.32%
• 6M: 19.42%
• 1Y: 35.35%
• 3Y*: 27.83%
• 5Y*: 14.07%
• 10Y*: 16.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCILX vs. FLVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund	8.68%	10.49%	14.36%	16.68%	-20.85%	24.76%	35.82%	37.85%	-2.40%	21.54%
FLVCX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund	21.32%	20.34%	26.95%	26.10%	-22.99%	26.08%	26.74%	35.60%	-16.43%	20.92%

Correlation

The correlation between LCILX and FLVCX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.89

The correlation between LCILX and FLVCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LCILX vs. FLVCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCILX

LCILX Risk / Return Rank: 38
LCILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
LCILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
LCILX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
LCILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
LCILX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

FLVCX

FLVCX Risk / Return Rank: 47
FLVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FLVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FLVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FLVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FLVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCILX vs. FLVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCILX	FLVCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.70	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.24	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.30	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	2.95	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.40	10.68	-1.28

LCILX vs. FLVCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the FLVCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCILX and FLVCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCILX vs. FLVCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCILX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum FLVCX drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCILX and FLVCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCILX	FLVCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.70%	-70.02%	+38.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.74%	-13.06%	+4.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.63%	-28.54%	+8.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.19%	-28.54%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.70%	-44.14%	+12.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.04%	-4.46%	+2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.26%	-10.98%	+5.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	3.60%	-1.59%

Volatility

LCILX vs. FLVCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) is 4.18%, while Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) has a volatility of 10.37%. This indicates that LCILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCILX	FLVCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	10.37%	-6.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.75%	18.59%	-8.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.39%	22.72%	-10.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.38%	23.16%	-5.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.13%	23.49%	-5.36%

LCILX vs. FLVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCILX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLVCX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCILX vs. FLVCX - Dividend Comparison

LCILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than FLVCX's 3.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLVCX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund	3.89%	4.72%	14.53%	12.19%	18.49%	8.40%	0.11%	0.10%	19.91%	18.96%	27.48%	6.18%
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund	4.48%	4.87%	6.02%	0.75%	0.42%	1.42%	4.18%	0.61%	0.56%	0.73%	0.80%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCILX and FLVCX in my portfolio?

LCILX and FLVCX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCILX or FLVCX?

FLVCX has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to LCILX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCILX dropped -31.70% vs FLVCX's -70.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLVCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.