LCILX vs. ARMGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LCILX (ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund) and ARMGX (Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund) are both mutual funds - LCILX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Legg Mason, while ARMGX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 10 years, LCILX returned 13.91%/yr vs 2.19%/yr for ARMGX. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LCILX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for ARMGX.

Performance

LCILX vs. ARMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) and Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCILX achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than ARMGX's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, LCILX has outperformed ARMGX with an annualized return of 13.91%, while ARMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.19% annualized return.

LCILX

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: -1.35%
• 6M: 8.24%
• YTD: 9.23%
• 1Y: 16.13%
• 3Y*: 12.62%
• 5Y*: 7.02%
• 10Y*: 13.91%
• ALL TIME*: 13.50%

ARMGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.11%
• 6M: 0.86%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 1Y: 2.89%
• 3Y*: 4.04%
• 5Y*: 2.72%
• 10Y*: 2.19%
• ALL TIME*: 1.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARMGX Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LCILX vs. ARMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund	9.23%	10.49%	14.36%	16.68%	-20.85%	24.76%	35.82%	37.85%	-2.40%	21.54%
ARMGX Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund	1.23%	4.20%	4.67%	5.25%	-1.91%	0.06%	0.80%	3.38%	0.91%	3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LCILX and ARMGX is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.15

The correlation between LCILX and ARMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LCILX vs. ARMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LCILX

LCILX Risk / Return Rank: 38
LCILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
LCILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
LCILX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
LCILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
LCILX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

ARMGX

ARMGX Risk / Return Rank: 98
ARMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ARMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ARMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ARMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ARMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LCILX vs. ARMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) and Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCILX	ARMGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	2.73	-1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	6.08	-4.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	2.24	-1.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	10.10	-8.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.80	38.53	-31.73

LCILX vs. ARMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the ARMGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCILX and ARMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCILX vs. ARMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCILX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, which is greater than ARMGX's maximum drawdown of -21.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCILX and ARMGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCILX	ARMGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.70%	-21.79%	-9.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.74%	-0.33%	-8.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.63%	-0.55%	-19.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.19%	-3.23%	-23.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.70%	-9.09%	-22.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.09%	-0.22%	-1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.22%	-1.53%	-3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	0.09%	+1.95%

Volatility

LCILX vs. ARMGX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX) at 0.19%. This indicates that LCILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCILX	ARMGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	0.19%	+2.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.80%	0.86%	+8.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.55%	1.21%	+11.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.37%	1.27%	+16.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.11%	1.62%	+16.49%

LCILX vs. ARMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCILX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMGX's 1.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCILX vs. ARMGX - Dividend Comparison

LCILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than ARMGX's 2.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARMGX Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund	2.63%	3.00%	2.43%	2.23%	1.37%	0.17%	1.45%	2.32%	1.92%	1.37%	0.96%	0.48%
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund	4.46%	4.87%	6.02%	0.75%	0.42%	1.42%	4.18%	0.61%	0.56%	0.73%	0.80%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCILX and ARMGX in my portfolio?

LCILX and ARMGX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCILX or ARMGX?

LCILX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to ARMGX (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCILX dropped -31.70% vs ARMGX's -21.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.