PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCHM.DE vs. LSMC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCHM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCHM.DE achieves a 22.92% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LCHM.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of 9.52%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.


LCHM.DE

1D
-0.50%
1M
6.36%
YTD
22.92%
6M
27.91%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
10.91%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
9.52%

LSMC.DE

1D
-3.34%
1M
12.86%
YTD
63.83%
6M
63.41%
1Y
126.99%
3Y*
62.06%
5Y*
36.20%
10Y*
28.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCHM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCHM.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc
22.92%13.24%-9.83%16.21%-14.63%24.72%10.72%24.43%-9.02%13.19%
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
63.83%32.60%66.54%74.46%-34.66%37.56%23.03%39.73%-5.73%12.36%

Correlation

The correlation between LCHM.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2008

0.45

The correlation between LCHM.DE and LSMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCHM.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCHM.DE
LCHM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LCHM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCHM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCHM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
LCHM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCHM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMC.DE
LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCHM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCHM.DELSMC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.59

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

10.37

-7.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

32.83

-22.42

LCHM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCHM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCHM.DE and LSMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCHM.DELSMC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

4.27

-2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

1.15

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

1.09

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.82

-0.35

Drawdowns

LCHM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCHM.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCHM.DE and LSMC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCHM.DELSMC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.72%

-39.77%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.34%

-12.53%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.12%

-36.22%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.60%

-39.77%

+15.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.17%

-39.77%

+8.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-3.34%

+1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-9.37%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.96%

-0.72%

Volatility

LCHM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE) is 6.63%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that LCHM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCHM.DELSMC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

11.23%

-4.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

22.18%

-7.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

30.40%

-12.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

31.21%

-13.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.92%

26.06%

-8.14%

LCHM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCHM.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCHM.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCHM.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LCHM.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCHM.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCHM.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

LCHM.DE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. LCHM.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Chemicals, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LCHM.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCHM.DE and LSMC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer