PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCHM.DE vs. DXSC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCHM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCHM.DE achieves a 22.92% return, which is significantly higher than DXSC.DE's 8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, LCHM.DE has underperformed DXSC.DE with an annualized return of 9.52%, while DXSC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.15% annualized return.


LCHM.DE

1D
-0.50%
1M
3.76%
YTD
22.92%
6M
27.52%
1Y
33.65%
3Y*
10.91%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
9.52%

DXSC.DE

1D
-0.44%
1M
3.67%
YTD
8.73%
6M
11.15%
1Y
7.84%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCHM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCHM.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc
22.92%13.24%-9.83%16.21%-14.63%24.72%10.72%24.43%-9.02%13.19%
DXSC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
8.73%8.23%-1.25%18.77%-13.04%26.49%13.22%22.28%-12.90%22.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LCHM.DE and DXSC.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2007

0.62

Over the past year, LCHM.DE and DXSC.DE have become more correlated (0.89) than their long-term average of 0.62, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCHM.DE vs. DXSC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCHM.DE
LCHM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LCHM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCHM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCHM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
LCHM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCHM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DXSC.DE
DXSC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
DXSC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCHM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCHM.DEDXSC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.10

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

0.58

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

1.79

+8.61

LCHM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCHM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the DXSC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCHM.DE and DXSC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCHM.DEDXSC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.49

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.22

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.51

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.07

+0.40

Drawdowns

LCHM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCHM.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, smaller than the maximum DXSC.DE drawdown of -73.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCHM.DE and DXSC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCHM.DEDXSC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.72%

-73.82%

+26.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.34%

-14.34%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.12%

-17.53%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.60%

-25.63%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.17%

-44.96%

+13.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-1.80%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-30.18%

+21.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

4.61%

-1.37%

Volatility

LCHM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE) have volatilities of 6.63% and 6.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCHM.DEDXSC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

6.43%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

14.24%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

16.91%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

17.98%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.92%

23.78%

-5.86%

LCHM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCHM.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DXSC.DE's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCHM.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCHM.DE nor DXSC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LCHM.DE and DXSC.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DXSC.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DXSC.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LCHM.DE.

LCHM.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Chemicals, while DXSC.DE tracks MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened 20-35. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LCHM.DE and 0.17% for DXSC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCHM.DE and DXSC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer