LCHI.DE vs. CNIE.DE
LCHI.DE (Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Acc) and CNIE.DE (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) are both China Equities funds - LCHI.DE tracks the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders while CNIE.DE tracks the MarketGrader New China ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCHI.DE returned 6.79%/yr vs -0.19%/yr for CNIE.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCHI.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CNIE.DE.
Performance
LCHI.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCHI.DE achieves a -6.56% return, which is significantly lower than CNIE.DE's -3.41% return.
LCHI.DE
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- -6.56%
- 6M
- -9.08%
- 1Y
- 3.00%
- 3Y*
- 6.79%
- 5Y*
- -6.02%
- 10Y*
- -0.61%
CNIE.DE
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 6M
- -5.32%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- -0.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCHI.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCHI.DE Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Acc | -6.56% | 21.51% | 20.39% | -16.01% | -18.45% | -7.60% |
CNIE.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | -3.41% | 8.76% | 7.28% | -12.40% | -22.84% | 8.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCHI.DE and CNIE.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between LCHI.DE and CNIE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCHI.DE vs. CNIE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LCHI.DE
CNIE.DE
LCHI.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Acc (LCHI.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCHI.DE | CNIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.08 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 0.53 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.37 | 1.17 | -0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCHI.DE | CNIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 0.42 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | -0.16 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
LCHI.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCHI.DE drawdown since its inception was -70.36%, which is greater than CNIE.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCHI.DE and CNIE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCHI.DE | CNIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.36% | -45.69% | -24.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.61% | -12.45% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.53% | -29.20% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.52% | -25.25% | -20.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -24.67% | -10.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.13% | 5.70% | +3.43% |
Volatility
LCHI.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Acc (LCHI.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE) at 4.49%. This indicates that LCHI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNIE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCHI.DE | CNIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.94% | 4.49% | +3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.06% | 10.68% | +3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 16.04% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.07% | 24.27% | +4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.29% | 24.27% | +1.02% |
LCHI.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCHI.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CNIE.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCHI.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCHI.DE nor CNIE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCHI.DE and CNIE.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNIE.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNIE.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCHI.DE.
LCHI.DE tracks MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders, while CNIE.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LCHI.DE and 0.60% for CNIE.DE.
Find the right allocation for LCHI.DE and CNIE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer