PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCEAX vs. FGINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCEAX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Diversified Dividend Fund (LCEAX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCEAX achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 17.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LCEAX has underperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 8.60%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.35% annualized return.


LCEAX

1D
0.79%
1M
0.95%
YTD
4.62%
6M
5.59%
1Y
17.06%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
8.60%

FGINX

1D
0.92%
1M
7.14%
YTD
17.90%
6M
22.44%
1Y
44.31%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
16.27%
10Y*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCEAX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCEAX
Invesco Diversified Dividend Fund
4.62%15.56%13.09%8.88%-1.67%18.98%0.10%25.05%-7.84%7.49%
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
17.90%29.78%15.13%11.98%3.03%21.37%-0.08%25.64%-10.27%18.08%

Correlation

The correlation between LCEAX and FGINX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2002

0.93

The correlation between LCEAX and FGINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCEAX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCEAX
LCEAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LCEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
LCEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FGINX
FGINX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCEAX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Diversified Dividend Fund (LCEAX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCEAXFGINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.72

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

6.20

-3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.88

23.67

-14.79

LCEAX vs. FGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCEAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the FGINX Sharpe Ratio of 4.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCEAX and FGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCEAXFGINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

4.01

-2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

1.10

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.79

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.55

-0.06

Drawdowns

LCEAX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCEAX drawdown since its inception was -50.30%, smaller than the maximum FGINX drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCEAX and FGINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCEAXFGINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.30%

-54.80%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-7.34%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-13.28%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.10%

-16.21%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.16%

-37.37%

+1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

0.00%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-9.70%

+4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.91%

+0.09%

Volatility

LCEAX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Diversified Dividend Fund (LCEAX) is 2.64%, while Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that LCEAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCEAXFGINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

2.79%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

8.23%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

11.36%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.67%

14.88%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

17.04%

-1.68%

LCEAX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCEAX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCEAX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison

LCEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.02%, more than FGINX's 9.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
9.64%11.28%12.40%7.11%7.04%11.97%6.59%51.75%25.36%5.13%4.12%5.66%
LCEAX
Invesco Diversified Dividend Fund
12.02%12.54%12.00%7.87%12.23%18.25%3.76%5.02%7.74%1.86%3.51%5.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCEAX and FGINX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGINX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to LCEAX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCEAX dropped -50.30% vs FGINX's -54.80%.

FGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.01 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCEAX and FGINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer