LCDS vs. AVIE
LCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF) and AVIE (Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LCDS returned 21.46% vs 25.47% for AVIE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCDS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVIE.
Performance
LCDS vs. AVIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCDS achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than AVIE's 16.28% return.
LCDS
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 21.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVIE
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCDS vs. AVIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF | 10.76% | 17.66% | 10.32% |
AVIE Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF | 16.28% | 11.37% | -1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCDS and AVIE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024 | 0.38 |
The correlation between LCDS and AVIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCDS vs. AVIE — Risk / Return Rank
LCDS
AVIE
LCDS vs. AVIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) and Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF (AVIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCDS | AVIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.44 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 5.15 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.19 | 16.27 | -6.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCDS vs. AVIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCDS drawdown since its inception was -18.39%, which is greater than AVIE's maximum drawdown of -12.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCDS and AVIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCDS | AVIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.39% | -12.39% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -4.97% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.63% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -2.97% | +0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 1.58% | +0.53% |
Volatility
LCDS vs. AVIE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) is 3.45%, while Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF (AVIE) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that LCDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCDS | AVIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 3.73% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 7.50% | +2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.21% | 10.21% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 12.90% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 12.90% | +3.22% |
LCDS vs. AVIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AVIE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCDS vs. AVIE - Dividend Comparison
LCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than AVIE's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVIE Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF | 1.43% | 1.75% | 1.89% | 3.72% | 0.39% |
LCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF | 0.86% | 0.92% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCDS and AVIE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVIE has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to LCDS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCDS dropped -18.39% vs AVIE's -12.39%.
On 1-year performance, AVIE leads with 25.47% vs 21.46% for LCDS. On fees, AVIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LCDS has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVIE has performed better with a 25.47% return vs 21.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LCDS.
AVIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.86% for LCDS.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LCDS and 0.25% for AVIE.
AVIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCDS and AVIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer