PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCDS vs. AVIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCDS vs. AVIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) and Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF (AVIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCDS achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than AVIE's 16.28% return.


LCDS

1D
0.45%
1M
2.18%
6M
9.14%
YTD
10.76%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVIE

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.10%
6M
13.30%
YTD
16.28%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCDS vs. AVIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF
10.76%17.66%10.32%
AVIE
Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF
16.28%11.37%-1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between LCDS and AVIE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024

0.38

The correlation between LCDS and AVIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCDS vs. AVIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCDS
LCDS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
LCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

AVIE
AVIE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCDS vs. AVIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) and Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF (AVIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCDSAVIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

5.15

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

16.27

-6.08

LCDS vs. AVIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the AVIE Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCDS and AVIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCDS vs. AVIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCDS drawdown since its inception was -18.39%, which is greater than AVIE's maximum drawdown of -12.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCDS and AVIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCDSAVIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.39%

-12.39%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-4.97%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.63%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-2.97%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

1.58%

+0.53%

Volatility

LCDS vs. AVIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) is 3.45%, while Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF (AVIE) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that LCDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCDSAVIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.73%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

7.50%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.21%

10.21%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

12.90%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

12.90%

+3.22%

LCDS vs. AVIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AVIE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCDS vs. AVIE - Dividend Comparison

LCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than AVIE's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AVIE
Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF
1.43%1.75%1.89%3.72%0.39%
LCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF
0.86%0.92%0.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCDS and AVIE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVIE has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to LCDS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCDS dropped -18.39% vs AVIE's -12.39%.

On 1-year performance, AVIE leads with 25.47% vs 21.46% for LCDS. On fees, AVIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LCDS has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVIE has performed better with a 25.47% return vs 21.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LCDS.

AVIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.86% for LCDS.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LCDS and 0.25% for AVIE.

AVIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCDS and AVIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer