LCDL vs. NTSD
LCDL (GraniteShares 2x Long LCID Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCDL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
LCDL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCDL
- 1D
- -18.78%
- 1M
- -33.34%
- YTD
- -82.24%
- 6M
- -89.30%
- 1Y
- -97.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCDL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCDL GraniteShares 2x Long LCID Daily ETF | -78.28% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 14.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCDL and NTSD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCDL vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
LCDL
NTSD
LCDL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long LCID Daily ETF (LCDL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCDL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCDL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.65 | 3.59 | -4.24 |
Drawdowns
LCDL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCDL drawdown since its inception was -98.50%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCDL and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCDL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.50% | -5.20% | -93.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.50% | -3.72% | -94.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.12% | -0.88% | -68.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 76.86% | — | — |
Volatility
LCDL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCDL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 98.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 151.10% | 25.41% | +125.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 149.61% | 25.41% | +124.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 149.61% | 25.41% | +124.20% |
LCDL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCDL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCDL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCDL nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCDL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for LCDL.
LCDL and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for LCDL and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for LCDL and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer