LBRE.DE vs. XDWM.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF Acc (LBRE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE).
LBRE.DE and XDWM.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LBRE.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 600 Basic Resources. It was launched on Aug 25, 2006. XDWM.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Mar 16, 2016. Both LBRE.DE and XDWM.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
LBRE.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LBRE.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBRE.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF Acc | 14.59% | 33.09% | -8.87% | -2.42% | 9.41% | 26.55% | 13.06% | 22.34% | -12.39% | 22.13% |
XDWM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C | 11.13% | 12.88% | 0.02% | 10.77% | -4.99% | 26.01% | 9.43% | 25.66% | -13.34% | 13.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBRE.DE achieves a 14.59% return, which is significantly higher than XDWM.DE's 11.13% return. Over the past 10 years, LBRE.DE has outperformed XDWM.DE with an annualized return of 15.53%, while XDWM.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.13% annualized return.
LBRE.DE
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 14.59%
- 6M
- 36.47%
- 1Y
- 55.77%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- 10.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
XDWM.DE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 11.13%
- 6M
- 18.57%
- 1Y
- 24.73%
- 3Y*
- 10.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LBRE.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBRE.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWM.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LBRE.DE vs. XDWM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LBRE.DE
XDWM.DE
LBRE.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF Acc (LBRE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBRE.DE | XDWM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 1.33 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 1.82 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 2.20 | +1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.57 | 10.28 | +5.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBRE.DE | XDWM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 1.33 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.50 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.63 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.61 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between LBRE.DE and XDWM.DE is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LBRE.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LBRE.DE nor XDWM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LBRE.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBRE.DE drawdown since its inception was -74.21%, which is greater than XDWM.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBRE.DE and XDWM.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBRE.DE | XDWM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.21% | -33.91% | -40.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.12% | -13.67% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.22% | -20.77% | -16.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.32% | -33.91% | -11.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.74% | -5.94% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -5.51% | -26.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 2.92% | +1.22% |
Volatility
LBRE.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF Acc (LBRE.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) at 8.40%. This indicates that LBRE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LBRE.DE | XDWM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.10% | 8.40% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.46% | 13.76% | +5.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.21% | 18.54% | +7.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.03% | 16.59% | +9.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.17% | 17.52% | +11.65% |