LAUU.L vs. XMTW.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LAUU.L (Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist) and XMTW.L (Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - LAUU.L tracks the MSCI Australia NR USD while XMTW.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LAUU.L returned 15.92%/yr vs 22.39%/yr for XMTW.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LAUU.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XMTW.L.

Performance

LAUU.L vs. XMTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LAUU.L is traded in USD, while XMTW.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMTW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAUU.L achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than XMTW.L's 65.93% return. Over the past 10 years, LAUU.L has underperformed XMTW.L with an annualized return of 15.92%, while XMTW.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.39% annualized return.

LAUU.L

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.25%
• YTD: 5.81%
• 6M: 4.48%
• 1Y: 12.47%
• 3Y*: 12.07%
• 5Y*: 5.33%
• 10Y*: 15.92%

XMTW.L

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 7.71%
• YTD: 65.93%
• 6M: 69.23%
• 1Y: 102.74%
• 3Y*: 44.06%
• 5Y*: 21.81%
• 10Y*: 22.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAUU.L vs. XMTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LAUU.L Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist	5.81%	17.87%	1.59%	12.22%	-7.81%	8.85%	11.75%	21.86%	73.15%	20.34%
XMTW.L Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C	65.93%	33.34%	23.89%	28.08%	-29.55%	27.79%	36.46%	35.08%	-8.68%	27.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LAUU.L and XMTW.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2010	0.55

The correlation between LAUU.L and XMTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

LAUU.L vs. XMTW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LAUU.L	XMTW.L
Financial Services	34.8%	11.8%
Basic Materials	24.7%	2.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	1.2%
Industrials	6.3%	2.8%
Real Estate	5.8%	-
Healthcare	5.5%	0.6%
Energy	5.0%	-
Communication Services	3.7%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	0.8%
Technology	2.5%	78.9%
Utilities	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

LAUU.L vs. XMTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAUU.L

LAUU.L Risk / Return Rank: 25
LAUU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
LAUU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
LAUU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
LAUU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
LAUU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

XMTW.L

XMTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
XMTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
XMTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
XMTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 96
XMTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XMTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAUU.L vs. XMTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LAUU.L	XMTW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	3.96	-3.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	4.54	-3.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.63	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	9.01	-7.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.39	26.69	-23.30

LAUU.L vs. XMTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAUU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the XMTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAUU.L and XMTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LAUU.L vs. XMTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAUU.L drawdown since its inception was -53.44%, smaller than the maximum XMTW.L drawdown of -99.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAUU.L and XMTW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAUU.L	XMTW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.44%	-99.34%	+45.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.66%	-11.34%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.15%	-27.72%	+4.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.35%	-41.17%	+15.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.04%	-41.17%	-3.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.30%	-6.47%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.18%	-33.12%	+12.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.67%	3.84%	-0.17%

Volatility

LAUU.L vs. XMTW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L) is 5.61%, while Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L) has a volatility of 10.98%. This indicates that LAUU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAUU.L	XMTW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	10.98%	-5.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.41%	21.82%	-8.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.97%	25.94%	-9.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.75%	26.57%	-6.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.78%	23.42%	+6.36%

LAUU.L vs. XMTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAUU.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XMTW.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

LAUU.L vs. XMTW.L - Dividend Comparison

LAUU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while XMTW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LAUU.L Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist	2.85%	3.02%	4.10%	3.38%	4.64%	3.30%	2.25%	3.92%	4.57%	3.75%	4.06%	2.69%
XMTW.L Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAUU.L and XMTW.L in my portfolio?

LAUU.L and XMTW.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LAUU.L or XMTW.L?

On fees, LAUU.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LAUU.L or XMTW.L?

LAUU.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMTW.L.

What is the main difference between LAUU.L and XMTW.L?

LAUU.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD, while XMTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LAUU.L and 0.65% for XMTW.L.