LAUU.L vs. 500U.L
LAUU.L (Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist) and 500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LAUU.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia NR USD, while 500U.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LAUU.L returned 5.08%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for 500U.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LAUU.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 500U.L.
Performance
LAUU.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAUU.L achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly lower than 500U.L's 10.41% return.
LAUU.L
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.32%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- —
500U.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.69%
LAUU.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAUU.L Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist | 8.08% | 17.36% | 1.39% | 11.94% | -7.97% | 8.38% | 11.35% | 21.36% | -11.21% |
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.41% | 17.98% | 24.83% | 26.85% | -19.06% | 30.19% | 18.05% | 32.02% | -6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAUU.L and 500U.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018 | 0.68 |
The correlation between LAUU.L and 500U.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
LAUU.L vs. 500U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LAUU.L
500U.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Utilities
Financial Services
LAUU.L
500U.L
Basic Materials
LAUU.L
500U.L
Consumer Cyclical
LAUU.L
500U.L
Industrials
LAUU.L
500U.L
Real Estate
LAUU.L
500U.L
Healthcare
LAUU.L
500U.L
Energy
LAUU.L
500U.L
Communication Services
LAUU.L
500U.L
Consumer Defensive
LAUU.L
500U.L
Technology
LAUU.L
500U.L
Utilities
LAUU.L
500U.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAUU.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank
LAUU.L
500U.L
LAUU.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAUU.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.44 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 3.34 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | 14.61 | -10.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAUU.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.41 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.88 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.23 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
LAUU.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAUU.L drawdown since its inception was -45.03%, which is greater than 500U.L's maximum drawdown of -34.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAUU.L and 500U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAUU.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.03% | -34.04% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | -8.34% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.29% | -18.29% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.38% | -24.22% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.28% | -0.51% | -3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.16% | -4.73% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 1.91% | +1.58% |
Volatility
LAUU.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) at 3.21%. This indicates that LAUU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAUU.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 3.21% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | 8.54% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.44% | 11.57% | +3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 15.79% | +3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 18.26% | +3.87% |
LAUU.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LAUU.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
LAUU.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison
LAUU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, while 500U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LAUU.L Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.40% | 2.60% | 3.90% | 3.13% | 4.48% | 2.86% | 1.94% | 3.50% | 3.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LAUU.L and 500U.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 500U.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
500U.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LAUU.L.
LAUU.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while 500U.L is S&P 500. LAUU.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD, while 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LAUU.L and 0.15% for 500U.L.
Find the right allocation for LAUU.L and 500U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer