PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LASYX vs. TTRZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LASYX vs. TTRZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund (LASYX) and Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LASYX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than TTRZX's 4.29% return. Over the past 10 years, LASYX has outperformed TTRZX with an annualized return of 3.65%, while TTRZX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.13% annualized return.


LASYX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.41%
6M
-0.98%
YTD
-0.48%
1Y
2.07%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*
3.65%
ALL TIME*
3.25%

TTRZX

1D
1.45%
1M
1.55%
6M
1.18%
YTD
4.29%
1Y
10.35%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
1.13%
ALL TIME*
3.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LASYX vs. TTRZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LASYX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund
-0.48%7.44%8.29%7.89%-7.97%1.33%10.19%3.96%0.53%3.38%
TTRZX
Templeton Global Total Return Fund
4.29%18.26%-6.61%6.28%-12.29%-5.14%-5.58%2.01%2.03%3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LASYX and TTRZX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2010

0.42

The correlation between LASYX and TTRZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LASYX vs. TTRZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LASYX
LASYX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
LASYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LASYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LASYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LASYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
LASYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

TTRZX
TTRZX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TTRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TTRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LASYX vs. TTRZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund (LASYX) and Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LASYXTTRZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

1.57

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

4.96

-2.84

LASYX vs. TTRZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LASYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the TTRZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LASYX and TTRZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LASYX vs. TTRZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LASYX drawdown since its inception was -11.24%, smaller than the maximum TTRZX drawdown of -33.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LASYX and TTRZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LASYXTTRZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-33.17%

+21.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.90%

-6.95%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.90%

-11.49%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.24%

-26.23%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.24%

-33.17%

+21.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-6.61%

+4.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-7.61%

+5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

2.19%

-1.13%

Volatility

LASYX vs. TTRZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund (LASYX) is 0.54%, while Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX) has a volatility of 2.18%. This indicates that LASYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTRZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LASYXTTRZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

2.18%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.35%

6.33%

-3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98%

7.50%

-4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.34%

9.24%

-5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.30%

7.81%

-4.51%

LASYX vs. TTRZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LASYX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TTRZX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

LASYX vs. TTRZX - Dividend Comparison

LASYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than TTRZX's 6.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LASYX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund
2.71%3.64%5.61%5.48%4.05%2.21%2.28%3.07%3.69%2.92%2.34%3.96%
TTRZX
Templeton Global Total Return Fund
6.90%5.57%8.19%5.95%7.54%8.18%4.84%6.96%5.55%3.54%2.94%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


LASYX and TTRZX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTRZX has higher volatility (2.18%) compared to LASYX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LASYX dropped -11.24% vs TTRZX's -33.17%.

TTRZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LASYX and TTRZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer