PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LASYX vs. LSIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LASYX vs. LSIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund (LASYX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LASYX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than LSIIX's 0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, LASYX has outperformed LSIIX with an annualized return of 3.77%, while LSIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.02% annualized return.


LASYX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.14%
6M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.07%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
7.30%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
3.77%

LSIIX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.23%
6M
0.48%
YTD
0.48%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*
3.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LASYX vs. LSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LASYX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund
-0.07%7.44%8.29%7.89%-7.97%1.33%10.19%3.96%0.53%3.38%
LSIIX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y
0.48%5.58%2.91%7.50%-11.31%0.18%11.60%9.04%-0.31%6.65%

Correlation

The correlation between LASYX and LSIIX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2010

0.48

Over the past year, LASYX and LSIIX have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LASYX vs. LSIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LASYX
LASYX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LASYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LASYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LASYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LASYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LASYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

LSIIX
LSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
LSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
LSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LASYX vs. LSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund (LASYX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LASYXLSIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.15

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.09

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.17

2.99

+0.18

LASYX vs. LSIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LASYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the LSIIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LASYX and LSIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LASYX vs. LSIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LASYX drawdown since its inception was -11.24%, smaller than the maximum LSIIX drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LASYX and LSIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LASYXLSIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-20.77%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.90%

-2.99%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.90%

-5.45%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.24%

-15.62%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.24%

-15.62%

+4.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.10%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-2.42%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.03%

-0.06%

Volatility

LASYX vs. LSIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund (LASYX) is 0.72%, while Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that LASYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LASYXLSIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

1.12%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

2.81%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99%

3.96%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.34%

5.30%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.30%

4.49%

-1.19%

LASYX vs. LSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LASYX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LSIIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

LASYX vs. LSIIX - Dividend Comparison

LASYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than LSIIX's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LASYX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund
2.70%3.64%5.61%5.48%4.05%2.21%2.28%3.07%3.69%2.92%2.34%3.96%
LSIIX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y
3.98%3.68%4.86%4.25%3.32%4.10%8.20%3.56%2.18%4.10%6.71%3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


LASYX and LSIIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSIIX has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to LASYX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LASYX dropped -11.24% vs LSIIX's -20.77%.

LASYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LASYX and LSIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer