PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LASI.DE vs. HYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LASI.DE vs. HYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LASI.DE) and High Yield ETF (HYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LASI.DE is traded in EUR, while HYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


LASI.DE

1D
-1.76%
1M
4.52%
YTD
29.51%
6M
29.84%
1Y
50.05%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
10.16%

HYLD

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LASI.DE vs. HYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LASI.DE
Amundi MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc
29.51%17.40%18.31%1.21%-13.80%1.76%12.18%20.64%-11.55%24.24%
HYLD
High Yield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.96%-5.99%13.30%-5.39%9.58%4.95%-4.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LASI.DE and HYLD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2010

0.23

The correlation between LASI.DE and HYLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LASI.DE vs. HYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LASI.DE
LASI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LASI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LASI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LASI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
LASI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LASI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

HYLD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LASI.DE vs. HYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LASI.DE) and High Yield ETF (HYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LASI.DEHYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.16

LASI.DE vs. HYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LASI.DEHYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

Drawdowns

LASI.DE vs. HYLD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LASI.DEHYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

Volatility

LASI.DE vs. HYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LASI.DEHYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

LASI.DE vs. HYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LASI.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HYLD's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

LASI.DE vs. HYLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither LASI.DE nor HYLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYLD
High Yield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.67%7.86%6.45%7.52%7.46%7.97%7.18%6.59%10.87%
LASI.DE
Amundi MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LASI.DE and HYLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LASI.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LASI.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for HYLD.

LASI.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while HYLD is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Eve Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for LASI.DE and 1.29% for HYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LASI.DE and HYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer