PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LANJX vs. FSMUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LANJX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett New Jersey Tax Free Fund (LANJX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LANJX achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's 0.31% return.


LANJX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.10%
6M
-0.13%
YTD
0.78%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
-0.25%
10Y*
1.81%
ALL TIME*
4.29%

FSMUX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-1.91%
6M
-0.02%
YTD
0.31%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LANJX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LANJX
Lord Abbett New Jersey Tax Free Fund
0.78%3.42%1.53%7.47%-12.99%0.68%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
0.31%3.14%2.99%6.78%-11.25%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between LANJX and FSMUX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021

0.82

The correlation between LANJX and FSMUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LANJX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LANJX
LANJX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LANJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LANJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
LANJX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LANJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LANJX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMUX
FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LANJX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett New Jersey Tax Free Fund (LANJX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LANJXFSMUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.53

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.53

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.39

8.83

-0.44

LANJX vs. FSMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LANJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the FSMUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LANJX and FSMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LANJX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LANJX drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, which is greater than FSMUX's maximum drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LANJX and FSMUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LANJXFSMUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.98%

-16.27%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-2.68%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.21%

-5.89%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.72%

-16.23%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-1.91%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-5.30%

+2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.75%

+0.06%

Volatility

LANJX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett New Jersey Tax Free Fund (LANJX) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) at 0.94%. This indicates that LANJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LANJXFSMUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

0.94%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

2.27%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.27%

3.17%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.77%

4.65%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.79%

4.59%

+0.20%

LANJX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LANJX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

LANJX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison

LANJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than FSMUX's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
2.71%3.26%3.74%3.18%2.14%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LANJX
Lord Abbett New Jersey Tax Free Fund
3.01%3.72%2.79%2.64%2.07%2.17%2.37%2.80%2.72%2.79%3.22%3.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


LANJX and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LANJX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to FSMUX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LANJX dropped -20.98% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.

FSMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LANJX and FSMUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer