LALDX vs. LADYX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LALDX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund) and LADYX (Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - LALDX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Lord Abbett, while LADYX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, LALDX returned 2.39%/yr vs 16.17%/yr for LADYX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. LALDX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for LADYX.

Performance

LALDX vs. LADYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LALDX achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than LADYX's 37.78% return. Over the past 10 years, LALDX has underperformed LADYX with an annualized return of 2.39%, while LADYX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.17% annualized return.

LALDX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 3.69%
• 3Y*: 4.68%
• 5Y*: 1.92%
• 10Y*: 2.39%

LADYX

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: 8.02%
• YTD: 37.78%
• 6M: 33.64%
• 1Y: 63.36%
• 3Y*: 24.53%
• 5Y*: 5.08%
• 10Y*: 16.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LALDX vs. LADYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LALDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	0.44%	5.70%	4.48%	4.76%	-5.48%	1.17%	2.98%	5.42%	1.24%	2.30%
LADYX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I	37.78%	14.64%	22.21%	8.74%	-35.92%	-2.50%	72.82%	31.89%	4.89%	30.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LALDX and LADYX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1997	-0.03

The correlation between LALDX and LADYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LALDX vs. LADYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LALDX

LALDX Risk / Return Rank: 61
LALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
LALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
LALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
LALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
LALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

LADYX

LADYX Risk / Return Rank: 75
LADYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
LADYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LADYX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
LADYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LADYX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LALDX vs. LADYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LALDX	LADYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.35	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.93	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.39	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	4.50	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.73	16.45	-3.72

LALDX vs. LADYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LALDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the LADYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LALDX and LADYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LALDX vs. LADYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LALDX drawdown since its inception was -10.58%, smaller than the maximum LADYX drawdown of -60.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LALDX and LADYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LALDX	LADYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.58%	-60.18%	+49.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.29%	-14.67%	+13.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.29%	-32.06%	+30.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.60%	-50.98%	+43.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.67%	-54.05%	+44.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	0.00%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.82%	-20.11%	+19.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	4.00%	-3.69%

Volatility

LALDX vs. LADYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) is 0.86%, while Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that LALDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LADYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LALDX	LADYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.86%	10.53%	-9.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.98%	22.92%	-20.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49%	28.16%	-25.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.71%	27.98%	-25.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.61%	27.39%	-24.78%

LALDX vs. LADYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LALDX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than LADYX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

LALDX vs. LADYX - Dividend Comparison

LALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, while LADYX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LADYX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	9.60%	7.58%	18.36%	28.34%	0.00%	0.00%	8.82%
LALDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	4.97%	5.01%	4.11%	4.09%	2.42%	2.37%	2.88%	3.59%	3.88%	3.71%	3.95%	3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LALDX and LADYX in my portfolio?

LALDX and LADYX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LALDX or LADYX?

LADYX has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to LALDX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LALDX dropped -10.58% vs LADYX's -60.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LADYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.