LALDX vs. HOBEX
LALDX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund) and HOBEX (Holbrook Income Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, LALDX returned 2.03%/yr vs 3.84%/yr for HOBEX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LALDX charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for HOBEX.
Performance
LALDX vs. HOBEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LALDX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than HOBEX's 2.12% return.
LALDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
HOBEX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 5.97%
- 3Y*
- 6.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- —
LALDX vs. HOBEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LALDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund | 0.96% | 5.70% | 4.48% | 4.76% | -5.48% | 1.17% | 2.98% | 5.42% | 1.24% | 2.30% |
HOBEX Holbrook Income Fund | 2.12% | 7.23% | 7.16% | 4.74% | -3.42% | 6.25% | 6.83% | 7.30% | 1.26% | 2.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between LALDX and HOBEX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LALDX vs. HOBEX — Risk / Return Rank
LALDX
HOBEX
LALDX vs. HOBEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) and Holbrook Income Fund (HOBEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LALDX | HOBEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 2.60 | -1.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 9.89 | -6.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 35.41 | -20.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LALDX | HOBEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.91 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 1.48 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.77 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
LALDX vs. HOBEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LALDX drawdown since its inception was -10.58%, smaller than the maximum HOBEX drawdown of -23.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LALDX and HOBEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LALDX | HOBEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -23.58% | +13.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | -0.61% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.29% | -2.74% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.60% | -4.57% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.82% | -1.06% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.17% | +0.14% |
Volatility
LALDX vs. HOBEX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Holbrook Income Fund (HOBEX) at 0.52%. This indicates that LALDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOBEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LALDX | HOBEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 0.52% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.91% | 1.63% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45% | 2.06% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.70% | 2.61% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.61% | 5.72% | -3.11% |
LALDX vs. HOBEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LALDX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than HOBEX's 1.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LALDX vs. HOBEX - Dividend Comparison
LALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than HOBEX's 5.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOBEX Holbrook Income Fund | 5.79% | 5.94% | 6.58% | 5.05% | 4.83% | 4.00% | 5.44% | 3.05% | 3.84% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LALDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund | 4.95% | 5.01% | 4.11% | 4.09% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 2.88% | 3.59% | 3.88% | 3.71% | 3.95% | 3.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LALDX and HOBEX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LALDX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to HOBEX (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LALDX dropped -10.58% vs HOBEX's -23.58%.
HOBEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LALDX and HOBEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer