PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAKE vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAKE vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAKE achieves a 24.77% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 13.25% return. Over the past 10 years, LAKE has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 1.78%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 66.42% annualized return.


LAKE

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.89%
6M
24.35%
YTD
24.77%
1Y
-22.62%
3Y*
-9.28%
5Y*
-13.90%
10Y*
1.78%

NVDA

1D
4.03%
1M
2.81%
6M
14.26%
YTD
13.25%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
70.82%
5Y*
60.22%
10Y*
66.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAKE vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAKE
Lakeland Industries, Inc.
24.77%-65.17%38.69%40.64%-38.71%-20.37%152.31%3.45%-28.25%39.90%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
13.25%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between LAKE and NVDA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999

0.08

The correlation between LAKE and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAKE:

$108.86M

NVDA:

$5.11T

EPS

LAKE:

-$2.12

NVDA:

$6.53

PS Ratio

LAKE:

0.57

NVDA:

20.36

PB Ratio

LAKE:

0.87

NVDA:

26.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAKE:

$193.32M

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAKE:

$62.57M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

LAKE:

-$9.83M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAKE vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAKE
LAKE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LAKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAKE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LAKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAKE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAKE vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LAKENVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.16

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

1.43

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.65

3.09

-3.74

LAKE vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAKE Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAKE and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAKE vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAKE drawdown since its inception was -86.68%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAKE and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAKENVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.68%

-89.72%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.15%

-20.21%

-35.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.17%

-36.88%

-34.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.26%

-66.34%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.56%

-66.34%

-16.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.62%

-10.41%

-64.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.17%

-36.12%

-14.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.55%

9.32%

+25.23%

Volatility

LAKE vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) has a higher volatility of 25.06% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 10.90%. This indicates that LAKE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAKENVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.06%

10.90%

+14.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.36%

27.21%

+20.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.15%

35.49%

+34.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.69%

51.83%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.27%

49.87%

-0.60%

Dividends

LAKE vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

LAKE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than NVDA's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAKE
Lakeland Industries, Inc.
0.54%1.36%0.47%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

LAKE vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lakeland Industries, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
47.42M
81.62B
(LAKE) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LAKE vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lakeland Industries, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
31.4%
74.9%
Portfolio components
LAKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lakeland Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.89M and revenue of 47.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

LAKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lakeland Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.29M and revenue of 47.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

LAKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lakeland Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 369.00K and revenue of 47.42M, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LAKE and NVDA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAKE has higher volatility (25.06%) compared to NVDA (10.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAKE dropped -86.68% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAKE and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer