LADYX vs. DMCRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LADYX (Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I) and DMCRX (Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LADYX returned 15.16%/yr vs 22.33%/yr for DMCRX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LADYX charges 0.67%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for DMCRX.

Performance

LADYX vs. DMCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LADYX achieves a 31.38% return, which is significantly higher than DMCRX's 23.52% return. Over the past 10 years, LADYX has underperformed DMCRX with an annualized return of 15.16%, while DMCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.33% annualized return.

LADYX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 5.89%
• YTD: 31.38%
• 6M: 27.10%
• 1Y: 60.03%
• 3Y*: 22.04%
• 5Y*: 4.91%
• 10Y*: 15.16%

DMCRX

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 23.52%
• 6M: 24.75%
• 1Y: 76.43%
• 3Y*: 29.83%
• 5Y*: 10.66%
• 10Y*: 22.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LADYX vs. DMCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LADYX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I	31.38%	14.64%	22.21%	8.74%	-35.92%	-2.50%	72.82%	31.89%	4.89%	30.27%
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund	23.52%	31.17%	30.58%	11.47%	-33.54%	22.23%	86.43%	34.03%	2.52%	24.35%

Correlation

The correlation between LADYX and DMCRX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2013	0.92

The correlation between LADYX and DMCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LADYX vs. DMCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LADYX

LADYX Risk / Return Rank: 68
LADYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
LADYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LADYX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
LADYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LADYX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

DMCRX

DMCRX Risk / Return Rank: 77
DMCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
DMCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
DMCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DMCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DMCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LADYX vs. DMCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LADYX	DMCRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.73	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	3.25	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.41	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.22	5.02	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.69	17.80	-2.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LADYX vs. DMCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LADYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the DMCRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LADYX and DMCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LADYX	DMCRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.73	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	0.27	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.66	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.59	-0.20

Drawdowns

LADYX vs. DMCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LADYX drawdown since its inception was -60.18%, roughly equal to the maximum DMCRX drawdown of -59.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LADYX and DMCRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LADYX	DMCRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.18%	-59.16%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.67%	-15.46%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.06%	-34.92%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.98%	-59.16%	+8.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.05%	-59.16%	+5.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-2.70%	+2.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.14%	-20.10%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	4.35%	-0.42%

Volatility

LADYX vs. DMCRX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) at 8.50%. This indicates that LADYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LADYX	DMCRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.55%	8.50%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.41%	21.12%	+0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.53%	28.50%	-1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.67%	39.48%	-11.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.23%	33.98%	-6.75%

LADYX vs. DMCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LADYX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than DMCRX's 1.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

LADYX vs. DMCRX - Dividend Comparison

LADYX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund	11.11%	13.72%	3.86%	0.87%	8.20%	48.23%	19.79%	14.70%	33.22%	8.91%	0.00%	4.20%
LADYX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	9.60%	7.58%	18.36%	28.34%	0.00%	0.00%	8.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LADYX and DMCRX in my portfolio?

LADYX and DMCRX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LADYX or DMCRX?

LADYX has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to DMCRX (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LADYX dropped -60.18% vs DMCRX's -59.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.