LADYX vs. CTSIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX).

LADYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Dec 30, 1997. CTSIX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Mar 23, 2011.

Performance

LADYX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LADYX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LADYX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I	-6.31%	14.64%	22.21%	8.74%	-35.92%	-2.50%	72.82%	-2.16%
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	0.55%	25.90%	44.34%	7.57%	-37.30%	9.12%	63.38%	1.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LADYX achieves a -6.31% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 0.55% return.

LADYX

• 1D: -3.58%
• 1M: -9.87%
• YTD: -6.31%
• 6M: -4.71%
• 1Y: 30.42%
• 3Y*: 9.61%
• 5Y*: -2.60%
• 10Y*: 11.60%

CTSIX

• 1D: 5.59%
• 1M: -7.48%
• YTD: 0.55%
• 6M: 3.66%
• 1Y: 43.97%
• 3Y*: 23.09%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LADYX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LADYX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

CTSIX

Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund

LADYX

Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I

Return for Risk

LADYX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LADYX

LADYX Risk / Return Rank: 62
LADYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
LADYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LADYX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
LADYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
LADYX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CTSIX

CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 83
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LADYX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LADYX	CTSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.48	-0.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	2.07	-0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.27	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	3.65	-1.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.52	13.94	-7.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LADYX vs. CTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LADYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the CTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LADYX and CTSIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LADYX	CTSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	1.48	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	0.13	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.42	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between LADYX and CTSIX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LADYX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LADYX nor CTSIX has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LADYX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	9.60%	7.58%	18.36%	28.34%	0.00%	0.00%	8.82%
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.77%	4.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LADYX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LADYX drawdown since its inception was -60.18%, which is greater than CTSIX's maximum drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LADYX and CTSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LADYX	CTSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.18%	-50.83%	-9.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.67%	-12.38%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.98%	-50.60%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.29%	-7.48%	-17.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.22%	-21.12%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	3.24%	+0.79%

Volatility

LADYX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) is 10.90%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 13.35%. This indicates that LADYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LADYX	CTSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.90%	13.35%	-2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.08%	21.82%	-1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.00%	29.67%	-1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.41%	27.87%	-0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.93%	29.76%	-2.83%