PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LAC.TO vs. HBM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

LAC.TO vs. HBM.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC.TO) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO).

Performance

LAC.TO vs. HBM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC.TO) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LAC.TO vs. HBM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.		-7.54%38.84%-49.41%-46.91%
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals Inc.		12.15%134.08%60.29%21.70%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAC.TO:

CA$1.74B

HBM.TO:

CA$12.22B

EPS

LAC.TO:

-CA$0.47

HBM.TO:

CA$1.43

PB Ratio

LAC.TO:

1.64

HBM.TO:

3.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAC.TO:

CA$0.00

HBM.TO:

CA$2.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAC.TO:

-CA$522.75K

HBM.TO:

CA$639.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAC.TO:

-CA$247.34M

HBM.TO:

CA$1.41B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAC.TO achieves a -7.54% return, which is significantly lower than HBM.TO's 12.15% return.

LAC.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
-21.03%
YTD
-7.54%
6M
-43.73%
1Y
39.75%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

HBM.TO

1D
4.87%
1M
-16.41%
YTD
12.15%
6M
42.60%
1Y
177.73%
3Y*
63.03%
5Y*
27.66%
10Y*
20.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lithium Americas Corp.

Hudbay Minerals Inc.

Often compared with LAC.TO:
LAC.TO vs. VGTLAC.TO vs. LIT
Often compared with HBM.TO:
HBM.TO vs. FM.TOHBM.TO vs. TECK-B.TOHBM.TO vs. LUN.TOHBM.TO vs. ERO.TOHBM.TO vs. ^TNXHBM.TO vs. SPYHBM.TO vs. DPM.TO

Return for Risk

LAC.TO vs. HBM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LAC.TO
LAC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LAC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LAC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
HBM.TO
HBM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
HBM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HBM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAC.TO vs. HBM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC.TO) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LAC.TOHBM.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.30

3.28

-2.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

3.37

-1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.46

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

5.02

-4.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.17

18.24

-17.07

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LAC.TO vs. HBM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the HBM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC.TO and HBM.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LAC.TOHBM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

3.28

-2.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.54

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.38

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

0.00

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between LAC.TO and HBM.TO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LAC.TO vs. HBM.TO - Dividend Comparison

LAC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.		0.00%0.00%0.00%166.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals Inc.		0.07%0.07%0.17%0.27%0.29%0.22%0.22%0.37%0.31%0.18%0.26%0.38%

Drawdowns

LAC.TO vs. HBM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, smaller than the maximum HBM.TO drawdown of -92.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC.TO and HBM.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

LAC.TOHBM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.70%

-92.86%

+11.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.78%

-35.94%

-27.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-62.48%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-84.01%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.52%

-20.93%

-44.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.60%

-62.57%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.68%

9.88%

+25.80%

Volatility

LAC.TO vs. HBM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC.TO) is 15.51%, while Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO) has a volatility of 20.87%. This indicates that LAC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

LAC.TOHBM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.51%

20.87%

-5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.98%

40.63%

+31.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

133.78%

54.53%

+79.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

102.92%

51.68%

+51.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.92%

56.00%

+46.92%

Financials

LAC.TO vs. HBM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Americas Corp. and Hudbay Minerals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober0
737.06M
(LAC.TO) Total Revenue
(HBM.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items