HBM.TO vs. DPM.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO) and Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM.TO).
Performance
HBM.TO vs. DPM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HBM.TO vs. DPM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBM.TO Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 6.93% | 134.08% | 60.29% | 6.88% | -25.13% | 3.05% | 66.44% | -16.44% | -41.80% | 45.20% |
DPM.TO Dundee Precious Metals Inc. | 15.46% | 228.58% | 56.68% | 33.46% | -13.25% | -12.83% | 66.69% | 55.00% | 20.00% | 33.33% |
Fundamentals
HBM.TO:
CA$11.65B
DPM.TO:
CA$10.87B
HBM.TO:
CA$1.43
DPM.TO:
CA$1.96
HBM.TO:
20.30
DPM.TO:
24.96
HBM.TO:
0.14
DPM.TO:
0.25
HBM.TO:
5.23
DPM.TO:
10.50
HBM.TO:
3.61
DPM.TO:
4.23
HBM.TO:
CA$2.22B
DPM.TO:
CA$883.13M
HBM.TO:
CA$639.91M
DPM.TO:
CA$478.08M
HBM.TO:
CA$1.41B
DPM.TO:
CA$533.70M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBM.TO achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly lower than DPM.TO's 15.46% return. Over the past 10 years, HBM.TO has underperformed DPM.TO with an annualized return of 20.38%, while DPM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 38.49% annualized return.
HBM.TO
- 1D
- 9.80%
- 1M
- -24.61%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 38.23%
- 1Y
- 167.25%
- 3Y*
- 60.46%
- 5Y*
- 26.45%
- 10Y*
- 20.38%
DPM.TO
- 1D
- 6.39%
- 1M
- -17.07%
- YTD
- 15.46%
- 6M
- 58.97%
- 1Y
- 158.51%
- 3Y*
- 73.35%
- 5Y*
- 46.70%
- 10Y*
- 38.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBM.TO vs. DPM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBM.TO
DPM.TO
HBM.TO vs. DPM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO) and Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBM.TO | DPM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.10 | 3.54 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.26 | 3.43 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.50 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.60 | 5.47 | -0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.88 | 21.57 | -4.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBM.TO | DPM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 3.54 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 1.23 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.81 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.21 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between HBM.TO and DPM.TO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HBM.TO vs. DPM.TO - Dividend Comparison
HBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than DPM.TO's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBM.TO Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.17% | 0.27% | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.22% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.18% | 0.26% | 0.38% |
DPM.TO Dundee Precious Metals Inc. | 0.42% | 0.62% | 1.69% | 2.52% | 4.01% | 1.92% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HBM.TO vs. DPM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBM.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.86%, roughly equal to the maximum DPM.TO drawdown of -94.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBM.TO and DPM.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBM.TO | DPM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.86% | -94.16% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.94% | -29.52% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.48% | -41.88% | -20.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.01% | -51.96% | -32.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.61% | -17.51% | -7.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.58% | -41.71% | -20.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.79% | 7.49% | +2.30% |
Volatility
HBM.TO vs. DPM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.05% compared to Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM.TO) at 16.92%. This indicates that HBM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DPM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HBM.TO | DPM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.05% | 16.92% | +4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.39% | 37.25% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.36% | 45.02% | +9.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.71% | 38.26% | +13.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.99% | 47.70% | +8.29% |
Financials
HBM.TO vs. DPM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hudbay Minerals Inc. and Dundee Precious Metals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HBM.TO vs. DPM.TO - Profitability Comparison
HBM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a gross profit of 166.81M and revenue of 737.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.6%.
DPM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Dundee Precious Metals Inc. reported a gross profit of 220.88M and revenue of 342.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.
HBM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported an operating income of 242.47M and revenue of 737.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.9%.
DPM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Dundee Precious Metals Inc. reported an operating income of 183.34M and revenue of 342.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.6%.
HBM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a net income of 129.97M and revenue of 737.06M, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.
DPM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Dundee Precious Metals Inc. reported a net income of 159.76M and revenue of 342.40M, resulting in a net margin of 46.7%.