L4K3.DE vs. CNIE.DE
L4K3.DE (Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc) and CNIE.DE (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) are both China Equities funds - L4K3.DE tracks the MSCI China while CNIE.DE tracks the MarketGrader New China ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, L4K3.DE returned 8.01%/yr vs -0.19%/yr for CNIE.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. L4K3.DE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CNIE.DE.
Performance
L4K3.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, L4K3.DE achieves a -6.67% return, which is significantly lower than CNIE.DE's -3.41% return.
L4K3.DE
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 6M
- -9.21%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- -4.01%
- 10Y*
- —
CNIE.DE
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 6M
- -5.32%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- -0.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
L4K3.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L4K3.DE Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc | -6.67% | 17.15% | 27.30% | -14.42% | -14.90% | -5.47% |
CNIE.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | -3.41% | 8.76% | 7.28% | -12.40% | -22.84% | 8.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between L4K3.DE and CNIE.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between L4K3.DE and CNIE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
L4K3.DE vs. CNIE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
L4K3.DE
CNIE.DE
L4K3.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc (L4K3.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| L4K3.DE | CNIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.08 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 0.53 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 1.17 | -0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| L4K3.DE | CNIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | 0.42 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | -0.16 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
L4K3.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum L4K3.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.69%, which is greater than CNIE.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L4K3.DE and CNIE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| L4K3.DE | CNIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.69% | -45.69% | -10.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.74% | -12.45% | -13.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.74% | -29.20% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.32% | -25.25% | -6.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -24.67% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.28% | 5.70% | +9.58% |
Volatility
L4K3.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc (L4K3.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE) at 4.49%. This indicates that L4K3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNIE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| L4K3.DE | CNIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 4.49% | +2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 10.68% | +2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.86% | 16.04% | +11.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.30% | 24.27% | +5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.03% | 24.27% | +3.76% |
L4K3.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
L4K3.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CNIE.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
L4K3.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither L4K3.DE nor CNIE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
L4K3.DE and CNIE.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, L4K3.DE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
L4K3.DE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNIE.DE.
L4K3.DE tracks MSCI China, while CNIE.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for L4K3.DE and 0.60% for CNIE.DE.
Find the right allocation for L4K3.DE and CNIE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer