PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
L100.L vs. MVEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

L100.L vs. MVEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

L100.L is traded in GBp, while MVEU.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MVEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, L100.L achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly higher than MVEU.L's 6.67% return. Over the past 10 years, L100.L has outperformed MVEU.L with an annualized return of 8.55%, while MVEU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.07% annualized return.


L100.L

1D
0.26%
1M
1.06%
6M
5.47%
YTD
8.80%
1Y
21.78%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
8.55%

MVEU.L

1D
0.91%
1M
0.51%
6M
5.14%
YTD
6.67%
1Y
10.00%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
7.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

L100.L vs. MVEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
L100.L
Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc
8.80%25.82%9.29%7.37%4.86%17.92%-11.79%17.40%-9.14%12.09%
MVEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
6.67%17.63%6.71%8.45%-8.16%14.46%1.57%15.47%-2.87%14.16%

Correlation

The correlation between L100.L and MVEU.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.75

The correlation between L100.L and MVEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

L100.L vs. MVEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
L100.L
MVEU.L

Technology

36.1%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
3.6%

Healthcare

13.2%
12.8%

Communication Services

11.5%
8.3%

Industrials

6.5%
15.6%

Utilities

6.1%
10.0%

Financial Services

4.7%
17.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
14.5%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.5%

Energy

0.9%
6.6%

Basic Materials

0.8%
5.2%

Technology

L100.L
36.1%
MVEU.L
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

L100.L
14.0%
MVEU.L
3.6%

Healthcare

L100.L
13.2%
MVEU.L
12.8%

Communication Services

L100.L
11.5%
MVEU.L
8.3%

Industrials

L100.L
6.5%
MVEU.L
15.6%

Utilities

L100.L
6.1%
MVEU.L
10.0%

Financial Services

L100.L
4.7%
MVEU.L
17.7%

Consumer Defensive

L100.L
3.9%
MVEU.L
14.5%

Real Estate

L100.L
2.3%
MVEU.L
1.5%

Energy

L100.L
0.9%
MVEU.L
6.6%

Basic Materials

L100.L
0.8%
MVEU.L
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

L100.L vs. MVEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

L100.L
L100.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
L100.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L100.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
L100.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
L100.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
L100.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MVEU.L
MVEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

L100.L vs. MVEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


L100.LMVEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.19

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.20

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

3.40

+4.40

L100.L vs. MVEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current L100.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of L100.L and MVEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

L100.L vs. MVEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum L100.L drawdown since its inception was -43.92%, which is greater than MVEU.L's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L100.L and MVEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


L100.LMVEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.92%

-23.74%

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-8.32%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.01%

-8.32%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.01%

-17.42%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-23.74%

-10.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-2.83%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.16%

-3.52%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.94%

-0.15%

Volatility

L100.L vs. MVEU.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L) have volatilities of 2.94% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


L100.LMVEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.82%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.79%

7.70%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

9.18%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.80%

11.30%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.88%

12.56%

+2.32%

L100.L vs. MVEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

L100.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than MVEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

L100.L vs. MVEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither L100.L nor MVEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


L100.L and MVEU.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, L100.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

L100.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MVEU.L.

L100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while MVEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for L100.L and 0.25% for MVEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for L100.L and MVEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer