L100.L vs. BNKE.L
L100.L (Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc) and BNKE.L (Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - L100.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while BNKE.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, L100.L returned 11.80%/yr vs 29.25%/yr for BNKE.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. L100.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for BNKE.L.
Performance
L100.L vs. BNKE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
L100.L is traded in GBp, while BNKE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BNKE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, L100.L achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly higher than BNKE.L's 4.63% return.
L100.L
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 21.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
BNKE.L
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 6.68%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 11.03%
- 1Y
- 45.15%
- 3Y*
- 46.04%
- 5Y*
- 29.25%
- 10Y*
- —
L100.L vs. BNKE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc | 6.14% | 25.82% | 9.29% | 7.37% | 4.86% | 17.92% | -11.79% | 1.78% |
BNKE.L Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 4.63% | 99.94% | 25.19% | 27.75% | 6.62% | 31.33% | -18.12% | 2.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between L100.L and BNKE.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between L100.L and BNKE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
L100.L vs. BNKE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
L100.L
BNKE.L
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
L100.L
BNKE.L
Consumer Defensive
L100.L
BNKE.L
-
Industrials
L100.L
BNKE.L
-
Healthcare
L100.L
BNKE.L
-
Energy
L100.L
BNKE.L
-
Basic Materials
L100.L
BNKE.L
-
Utilities
L100.L
BNKE.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
L100.L
BNKE.L
-
Communication Services
L100.L
BNKE.L
-
Real Estate
L100.L
BNKE.L
-
Technology
L100.L
BNKE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
L100.L vs. BNKE.L — Risk / Return Rank
L100.L
BNKE.L
L100.L vs. BNKE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) and Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| L100.L | BNKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.32 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 2.70 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 8.72 | -0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| L100.L | BNKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.93 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 1.15 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.75 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
L100.L vs. BNKE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum L100.L drawdown since its inception was -44.41%, smaller than the maximum BNKE.L drawdown of -48.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L100.L and BNKE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| L100.L | BNKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.41% | -48.52% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -16.66% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.01% | -18.40% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.01% | -34.21% | +21.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.85% | -1.62% | -2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -10.40% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 5.17% | -2.56% |
Volatility
L100.L vs. BNKE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) is 3.93%, while Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that L100.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNKE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| L100.L | BNKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 6.10% | -2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 18.62% | -9.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 23.28% | -12.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 25.45% | -12.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 29.62% | -14.50% |
L100.L vs. BNKE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
L100.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKE.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
L100.L vs. BNKE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither L100.L nor BNKE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
L100.L and BNKE.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, L100.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
L100.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BNKE.L.
L100.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while BNKE.L is Financials Equities. L100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while BNKE.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for L100.L and 0.30% for BNKE.L.
Find the right allocation for L100.L and BNKE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer