L100.L vs. 500U.L
L100.L (Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc) and 500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - L100.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while 500U.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, L100.L returned 9.00%/yr vs 16.58%/yr for 500U.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. L100.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 500U.L.
Performance
L100.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
L100.L is traded in GBp, while 500U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 500U.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, L100.L achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than 500U.L's 10.84% return. Over the past 10 years, L100.L has underperformed 500U.L with an annualized return of 9.00%, while 500U.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.58% annualized return.
L100.L
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 21.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
500U.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 29.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 16.58%
L100.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc | 6.14% | 25.82% | 9.29% | 7.37% | 4.86% | 17.92% | -11.79% | 17.40% | -9.14% | 12.45% |
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.86% | 9.90% | 26.63% | 20.51% | -9.65% | 31.37% | 13.61% | 27.86% | -0.37% | 11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between L100.L and 500U.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2011 | 0.38 |
The correlation between L100.L and 500U.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
L100.L vs. 500U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
L100.L
500U.L
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
L100.L
500U.L
Consumer Defensive
L100.L
500U.L
Industrials
L100.L
500U.L
Healthcare
L100.L
500U.L
Energy
L100.L
500U.L
Basic Materials
L100.L
500U.L
Utilities
L100.L
500U.L
Consumer Cyclical
L100.L
500U.L
Communication Services
L100.L
500U.L
Real Estate
L100.L
500U.L
Technology
L100.L
500U.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
L100.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank
L100.L
500U.L
L100.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| L100.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.45 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 4.04 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 13.57 | -5.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| L100.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.45 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 1.00 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 1.17 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.33 | -0.98 |
Drawdowns
L100.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum L100.L drawdown since its inception was -44.41%, which is greater than 500U.L's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L100.L and 500U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| L100.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.41% | -26.14% | -18.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -7.19% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.01% | -20.95% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.01% | -20.95% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.64% | -26.14% | -8.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.85% | -0.22% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -3.62% | -3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.15% | +0.46% |
Volatility
L100.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) at 3.59%. This indicates that L100.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| L100.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 3.59% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 8.66% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 11.86% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 15.26% | -2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 18.56% | -3.44% |
L100.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
L100.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
L100.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither L100.L nor 500U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
L100.L and 500U.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, L100.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
L100.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500U.L.
L100.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while 500U.L is S&P 500. L100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for L100.L and 0.15% for 500U.L.
Find the right allocation for L100.L and 500U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer