PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KYLD vs. OMAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KYLD vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv High Income ETF (KYLD) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KYLD achieves a 18.37% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.


KYLD

1D
0.00%
1M
10.94%
YTD
18.37%
6M
13.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OMAH

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.44%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.00%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KYLD vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KYLD and OMAH is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KYLD vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KYLD

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KYLD vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv High Income ETF (KYLD) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KYLD vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KYLDOMAHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.70

-0.41

Drawdowns

KYLD vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KYLD drawdown since its inception was -20.69%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KYLD and OMAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KYLDOMAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.69%

-11.83%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.65%

+2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.57%

-1.26%

-7.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

Volatility

KYLD vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KYLDOMAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.84%

8.05%

+24.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.84%

13.21%

+19.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.84%

13.21%

+19.63%

KYLD vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KYLD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

KYLD vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

KYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.05%, more than OMAH's 15.44% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KYLD and OMAH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KYLD.

KYLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.05%, compared with 15.44% for OMAH.

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KYLD and 0.95% for OMAH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KYLD and OMAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer