KWE3.L vs. AVGI.L
KWE3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities) and AVGI.L (IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - KWE3.L is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while AVGI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. KWE3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AVGI.L.
Performance
KWE3.L vs. AVGI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KWE3.L
- 1D
- -8.33%
- 1M
- -30.19%
- YTD
- -61.38%
- 6M
- -66.62%
- 1Y
- -63.79%
- 3Y*
- -38.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGI.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWE3.L vs. AVGI.L — Risk / Return Rank
KWE3.L
AVGI.L
KWE3.L vs. AVGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) and IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP (AVGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KWE3.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KWE3.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | — | — |
Drawdowns
KWE3.L vs. AVGI.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWE3.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.98% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.95% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.81% | — | — |
Volatility
KWE3.L vs. AVGI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWE3.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.75% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 135.90% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 135.90% | — | — |
KWE3.L vs. AVGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWE3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWE3.L vs. AVGI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither KWE3.L nor AVGI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, AVGI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KWE3.L.
KWE3.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AVGI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KWE3.L and 0.55% for AVGI.L.
Find the right allocation for KWE3.L and AVGI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer