PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KWE3.L vs. 3BP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KWE3.L vs. 3BP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) and Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KWE3.L vs. 3BP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KWE3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities
-48.88%11.50%-22.89%-61.89%-87.79%-17.62%
3BP.L
Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX
111.16%25.64%-50.82%-10.77%42.43%3.94%
Different Trading Currencies

KWE3.L is traded in USD, while 3BP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3BP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KWE3.L achieves a -48.88% return, which is significantly lower than 3BP.L's 111.16% return.


KWE3.L

1D
4.80%
1M
-21.55%
YTD
-48.88%
6M
-71.40%
1Y
-61.53%
3Y*
-42.77%
5Y*
10Y*

3BP.L

1D
-12.96%
1M
52.64%
YTD
111.16%
6M
105.85%
1Y
86.12%
3Y*
-1.93%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KWE3.L vs. 3BP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KWE3.L and 3BP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

KWE3.L vs. 3BP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWE3.L
KWE3.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
KWE3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

3BP.L
3BP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
3BP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
3BP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KWE3.L vs. 3BP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) and Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KWE3.L3BP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.71

0.94

-1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.93

1.57

-2.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.22

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

1.71

-2.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.73

4.89

-6.62

KWE3.L vs. 3BP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KWE3.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the 3BP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KWE3.L and 3BP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KWE3.L3BP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

0.94

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.10

-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between KWE3.L and 3BP.L is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KWE3.L vs. 3BP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither KWE3.L nor 3BP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KWE3.L vs. 3BP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWE3.L drawdown since its inception was -98.42%, which is greater than 3BP.L's maximum drawdown of -84.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWE3.L and 3BP.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KWE3.L3BP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.42%

-85.47%

-12.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.02%

-59.39%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.34%

-35.33%

-63.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.05%

-43.72%

-46.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.93%

18.26%

+16.67%

Volatility

KWE3.L vs. 3BP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) is 26.88%, while Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L) has a volatility of 35.44%. This indicates that KWE3.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3BP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KWE3.L3BP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.88%

35.44%

-8.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.44%

62.35%

-8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.04%

90.88%

-4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

137.43%

91.34%

+46.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

137.43%

91.46%

+45.97%