PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KURA vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KURA vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kura Oncology, Inc. (KURA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KURA achieves a -13.28% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, KURA has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 8.46%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 64.62% annualized return.


KURA

1D
-3.22%
1M
-18.83%
6M
10.96%
YTD
-13.28%
1Y
49.67%
3Y*
-4.49%
5Y*
-13.81%
10Y*
8.46%
ALL TIME*
1.11%

NVDA

1D
2.93%
1M
3.04%
6M
5.16%
YTD
7.77%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
62.93%
5Y*
59.52%
10Y*
64.62%
ALL TIME*
36.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.60M$15.26M$17.77M
$25.46B$26.13B$31.85B

KURA vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KURA
Kura Oncology, Inc.
-13.28%19.29%-39.43%15.87%-11.36%-57.13%137.53%-2.07%-8.24%159.32%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
7.77%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between KURA and NVDA is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2015

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KURA:

$799.86M

NVDA:

$4.86T

EPS

KURA:

-$3.34

NVDA:

$6.53

PS Ratio

KURA:

11.08

NVDA:

19.35

PB Ratio

KURA:

7.40

NVDA:

25.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

KURA:

$71.64M

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KURA:

$67.71M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

KURA:

-$304.14M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KURA vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KURA
KURA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KURA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KURA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
KURA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KURA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
KURA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KURA vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kura Oncology, Inc. (KURA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KURANVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.09

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

0.65

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.51

1.32

+1.19

KURA vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KURA Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KURA and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KURA vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KURA drawdown since its inception was -86.69%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KURA and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KURANVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.69%

-89.72%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.04%

-20.21%

-18.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.46%

-36.88%

-39.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.46%

-66.34%

-10.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.69%

-66.34%

-20.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.35%

-14.74%

-63.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.60%

-36.07%

-11.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.53%

9.90%

+9.63%

Volatility

KURA vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Kura Oncology, Inc. (KURA) has a higher volatility of 17.27% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.04%. This indicates that KURA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KURANVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.27%

12.04%

+5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.63%

28.30%

+11.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.33%

36.41%

+24.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.39%

51.87%

+10.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.81%

49.95%

+18.86%

Dividends

KURA vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

KURA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KURA
Kura Oncology, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

KURA vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kura Oncology, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KURA and NVDA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KURA has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to NVDA (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KURA dropped -86.69% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

KURA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KURA and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer