KTEC vs. SBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KTEC returned -15.81% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. KTEC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

KTEC vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -17.62% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.

KTEC

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -1.75%
• 6M: -25.13%
• YTD: -17.62%
• 1Y: -15.81%
• 3Y*: 1.41%
• 5Y*: -10.84%
• 10Y*: —

SBIT

• 1D: 5.38%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 58.27%
• YTD: 44.00%
• 1Y: 124.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KTEC vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-17.62%	21.01%	21.07%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	44.00%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between KTEC and SBIT is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.26

Return for Risk

KTEC vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 52
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KTEC vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KTEC	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	1.41	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.68	2.05	-2.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.25	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	2.60	-3.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.82	5.92	-6.75

KTEC vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KTEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KTEC and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KTEC vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KTEC	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.90%	-91.35%	+24.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.49%	-47.94%	+11.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.02%	-77.15%	+29.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.03%	-68.83%	+24.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.26%	21.04%	-1.78%

Volatility

KTEC vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) is 6.94%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that KTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KTEC	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.94%	22.98%	-16.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.53%	68.89%	-48.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.05%	88.51%	-60.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.14%	96.89%	-53.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.89%	96.89%	-54.00%

KTEC vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

KTEC vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than SBIT's 3.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	4.07%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.97%	0.52%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KTEC and SBIT in my portfolio?

KTEC and SBIT have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KTEC or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to KTEC (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTEC dropped -66.90% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, KTEC or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs -15.81% for KTEC. On fees, KTEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KTEC or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs -15.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KTEC or SBIT?

KTEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KTEC or SBIT?

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 3.97% for SBIT.

What is the main difference between KTEC and SBIT?

KTEC is categorized as China Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KTEC and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.