PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSTR.L vs. XDEV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KSTR.L vs. XDEV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KSTR.L is traded in USD, while XDEV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSTR.L achieves a 41.53% return, which is significantly higher than XDEV.L's 30.33% return.


KSTR.L

1D
-4.62%
1M
3.52%
6M
25.64%
YTD
41.53%
1Y
93.56%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
-0.22%
10Y*

XDEV.L

1D
-1.10%
1M
-3.59%
6M
26.45%
YTD
30.33%
1Y
57.83%
3Y*
26.88%
5Y*
16.75%
10Y*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSTR.L vs. XDEV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KSTR.L
KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF
41.53%42.76%5.23%-18.80%-38.16%2.78%
XDEV.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C
30.33%40.36%5.01%19.23%-9.79%1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between KSTR.L and XDEV.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.26

The correlation between KSTR.L and XDEV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSTR.L vs. XDEV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSTR.L
KSTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
KSTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEV.L
XDEV.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSTR.L vs. XDEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KSTR.LXDEV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.62

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

6.59

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.21

23.86

-11.65

KSTR.L vs. XDEV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSTR.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSTR.L and XDEV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KSTR.L vs. XDEV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSTR.L drawdown since its inception was -66.67%, which is greater than XDEV.L's maximum drawdown of -50.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSTR.L and XDEV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSTR.LXDEV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.67%

-50.32%

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.42%

-8.73%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.60%

-18.80%

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.38%

-26.72%

-39.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.75%

-3.88%

-14.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.83%

-21.78%

-18.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.58%

2.42%

+5.16%

Volatility

KSTR.L vs. XDEV.L - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L) has a higher volatility of 19.20% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) at 5.95%. This indicates that KSTR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSTR.LXDEV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.20%

5.95%

+13.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.48%

13.95%

+19.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.57%

16.24%

+24.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.52%

20.88%

+13.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.46%

22.09%

+12.37%

KSTR.L vs. XDEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSTR.L has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEV.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

KSTR.L vs. XDEV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither KSTR.L nor XDEV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KSTR.L and XDEV.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for KSTR.L.

KSTR.L tracks KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF, while XDEV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for KSTR.L and 0.25% for XDEV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSTR.L and XDEV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer