KSOAX vs. UMBHX
KSOAX (Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. KSOAX charges 1.89%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
KSOAX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KSOAX
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -7.60%
- YTD
- 17.17%
- 6M
- 16.45%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 25.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 18.92%
UMBHX
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KSOAX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KSOAX Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A | -5.00% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | -1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between KSOAX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KSOAX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
KSOAX
UMBHX
KSOAX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KSOAX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.17 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.41 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KSOAX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | -20.59 | +21.11 |
Drawdowns
KSOAX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KSOAX drawdown since its inception was -70.21%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSOAX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KSOAX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.21% | -1.86% | -68.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.84% | -1.86% | -17.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.88% | -1.26% | -14.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.21% | — | — |
Volatility
KSOAX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KSOAX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.93% | 6.22% | +19.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.84% | 6.22% | +21.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 6.22% | +19.91% |
KSOAX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KSOAX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
KSOAX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
Neither KSOAX nor UMBHX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KSOAX Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.52% | 6.72% | 0.00% | 1.41% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, KSOAX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for KSOAX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer