PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSOAX vs. LMIYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KSOAX vs. LMIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX) and Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund (LMIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSOAX achieves a 17.61% return, which is significantly lower than LMIYX's 26.75% return. Over the past 10 years, KSOAX has underperformed LMIYX with an annualized return of 18.96%, while LMIYX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.14% annualized return.


KSOAX

1D
0.37%
1M
-7.03%
YTD
17.61%
6M
13.30%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
25.58%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
18.96%

LMIYX

1D
0.07%
1M
8.07%
YTD
26.75%
6M
25.86%
1Y
53.70%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
21.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSOAX vs. LMIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KSOAX
Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A
17.61%-8.89%68.00%-14.98%31.64%49.94%2.04%26.72%0.00%25.94%
LMIYX
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund
26.75%11.02%27.28%6.14%-29.10%32.54%79.45%34.34%2.19%38.54%

Correlation

The correlation between KSOAX and LMIYX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2001

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between KSOAX and LMIYX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSOAX vs. LMIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSOAX
KSOAX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
KSOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
KSOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

LMIYX
LMIYX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LMIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LMIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSOAX vs. LMIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX) and Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund (LMIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KSOAXLMIYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.19

2.12

-1.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.44

2.80

-2.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.34

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

4.66

-4.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.59

16.20

-15.61

KSOAX vs. LMIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSOAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the LMIYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSOAX and LMIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KSOAXLMIYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

2.12

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.35

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.73

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.49

+0.04

Drawdowns

KSOAX vs. LMIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSOAX drawdown since its inception was -70.21%, which is greater than LMIYX's maximum drawdown of -61.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSOAX and LMIYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSOAXLMIYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.21%

-61.35%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-11.80%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.28%

-31.16%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

-42.86%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.11%

-43.37%

-3.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.54%

-1.00%

-18.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.88%

-18.31%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.29%

3.39%

+4.90%

Volatility

KSOAX vs. LMIYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX) is 6.04%, while Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund (LMIYX) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that KSOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSOAXLMIYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

9.13%

-3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.68%

20.57%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.88%

26.09%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.84%

30.16%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.13%

29.03%

-2.90%

KSOAX vs. LMIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSOAX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LMIYX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

KSOAX vs. LMIYX - Dividend Comparison

KSOAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LMIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KSOAX
Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%3.52%6.72%0.00%1.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMIYX
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth Fund
0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%22.32%23.16%15.30%37.13%15.17%0.00%21.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


KSOAX and LMIYX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMIYX has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to KSOAX (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSOAX dropped -70.21% vs LMIYX's -61.35%.

LMIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSOAX and LMIYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer