PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRWL.L vs. UB20.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KRWL.L vs. UB20.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Korea UCITS ETF - Acc (KRWL.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRWL.L achieves a 110.31% return, which is significantly higher than UB20.L's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, KRWL.L has outperformed UB20.L with an annualized return of 17.72%, while UB20.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.


KRWL.L

1D
2.63%
1M
4.27%
YTD
110.31%
6M
120.96%
1Y
205.53%
3Y*
48.22%
5Y*
19.85%
10Y*
17.72%

UB20.L

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.10%
1Y
16.54%
3Y*
11.55%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRWL.L vs. UB20.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KRWL.L
Lyxor MSCI Korea UCITS ETF - Acc
110.31%86.86%-21.27%13.04%-19.64%-7.54%38.43%7.15%-16.77%32.35%
UB20.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
8.56%12.00%6.98%-0.10%5.26%5.29%3.52%14.10%-5.54%14.53%

Correlation

The correlation between KRWL.L and UB20.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2012

0.60

The correlation between KRWL.L and UB20.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KRWL.L vs. UB20.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KRWL.L
UB20.L

Technology

39.8%
1.0%

Healthcare

15.9%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
3.0%

Communication Services

6.5%
2.6%

Industrials

6.3%
8.5%

Financial Services

4.5%
45.1%

Utilities

3.4%
3.5%

Energy

2.3%
2.7%

Real Estate

2.0%
7.8%

Basic Materials

0.1%
16.3%

Technology

KRWL.L
39.8%
UB20.L
1.0%

Healthcare

KRWL.L
15.9%
UB20.L
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

KRWL.L
12.6%
UB20.L
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

KRWL.L
8.6%
UB20.L
3.0%

Communication Services

KRWL.L
6.5%
UB20.L
2.6%

Industrials

KRWL.L
6.3%
UB20.L
8.5%

Financial Services

KRWL.L
4.5%
UB20.L
45.1%

Utilities

KRWL.L
3.4%
UB20.L
3.5%

Energy

KRWL.L
2.3%
UB20.L
2.7%

Real Estate

KRWL.L
2.0%
UB20.L
7.8%

Basic Materials

KRWL.L
0.1%
UB20.L
16.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRWL.L vs. UB20.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRWL.L
KRWL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KRWL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRWL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRWL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
KRWL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRWL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

UB20.L
UB20.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
UB20.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB20.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB20.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
UB20.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB20.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRWL.L vs. UB20.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Korea UCITS ETF - Acc (KRWL.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRWL.LUB20.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.27

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.47

2.25

+7.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.12

6.49

+25.63

KRWL.L vs. UB20.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRWL.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.12, which is higher than the UB20.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRWL.L and UB20.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRWL.L vs. UB20.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRWL.L drawdown since its inception was -99.01%, which is greater than UB20.L's maximum drawdown of -32.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRWL.L and UB20.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRWL.LUB20.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.01%

-32.34%

-66.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.55%

-7.32%

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.42%

-17.80%

-10.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.54%

-17.80%

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.01%

-32.34%

-66.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

-3.32%

-3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.75%

-6.50%

-10.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.37%

2.54%

+3.83%

Volatility

KRWL.L vs. UB20.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Korea UCITS ETF - Acc (KRWL.L) has a higher volatility of 18.80% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) at 3.82%. This indicates that KRWL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UB20.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRWL.LUB20.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.80%

3.82%

+14.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.99%

8.92%

+27.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.91%

11.21%

+28.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.31%

14.00%

+12.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,803.17%

15.75%

+2,787.42%

KRWL.L vs. UB20.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRWL.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than UB20.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

KRWL.L vs. UB20.L - Dividend Comparison

KRWL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UB20.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRWL.L
Lyxor MSCI Korea UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UB20.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.93%3.86%3.26%3.96%3.66%2.60%3.05%4.08%4.33%3.43%4.00%5.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


KRWL.L and UB20.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UB20.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB20.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for KRWL.L.

KRWL.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while UB20.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for KRWL.L and 0.30% for UB20.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRWL.L and UB20.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer