PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KROP.L vs. XSTC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KROP.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc (KROP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KROP.L is traded in USD, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KROP.L achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 17.63% return.


KROP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.11%
6M
6.61%
YTD
14.16%
1Y
9.77%
3Y*
-1.04%
5Y*
10Y*

XSTC.L

1D
-0.46%
1M
-2.24%
6M
20.26%
YTD
17.63%
1Y
32.06%
3Y*
29.30%
5Y*
19.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KROP.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
KROP.L
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc
14.16%7.62%-8.33%-22.51%-24.21%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
17.63%22.94%37.18%56.67%-21.99%

Correlation

The correlation between KROP.L and XSTC.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between KROP.L and XSTC.L has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KROP.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KROP.L
KROP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
KROP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KROP.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc (KROP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KROP.LXSTC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

1.82

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

4.96

-3.08

KROP.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KROP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KROP.L and XSTC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KROP.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KROP.L drawdown since its inception was -52.04%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP.L and XSTC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KROP.LXSTC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.04%

-35.20%

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-17.54%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.32%

-27.66%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.04%

-7.26%

-30.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.93%

-7.34%

-29.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.21%

6.45%

-1.24%

Volatility

KROP.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc (KROP.L) is 4.31%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that KROP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KROP.LXSTC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

7.59%

-3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

17.41%

-4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

22.04%

-5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

23.83%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.25%

23.49%

-2.24%

KROP.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KROP.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

KROP.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

KROP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
KROP.L
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.27%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


KROP.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.L.

KROP.L tracks Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Acc, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KROP.L and XSTC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer